Archives

Wherein I Commit My First Act of Fanfic…

I’ve engaged with my various media-related obsessions in lots of different ways over the years, but I must confess I’ve never had much use for fan fiction, better-known in geeky circles as “fanfic.”

No offense if fanfic is your thing; it’s just never been my thing. As far as writing goes, I’ve always thought my time and energies ought to be spent working on my own original ideas rather than playing in someone else’s sandbox. And when it comes to reading fanfic… well, I haven’t delved very deeply into the scene, but what I’ve encountered by chance has been all over the map in terms of quality, with the low end being really astonishingly painful, and often the themes or scenarios being explored do not speak to my interests, assuming they don’t outright contradict my understanding of the parent property. (For instance, so-called “slash” fiction — which I understand is a common subcategory of fanfic — offends my sensibilities not because it depicts same-sex relationships, but because the characters involved are usually not defined as homosexual in the original source material. Kirk and Spock, the stars of the earliest documented slash stories that I know of, are not gay; there is no on-screen evidence anywhere that they have same-sex attractions toward anybody, let alone each other, so stories in which they get together don’t pass muster with my suspension of disbelief. They’re just not plausible in my mind.) So, yeah, not into fanfic.

Which means that I am rather chagrined as I announce that I have, in fact, just written a piece of it myself.

I didn’t really intend to… and I don’t know that I ever will again. It’s just that I had this idea a while back, and it’s steadfastly refused to leave my imagination alone, even after months of neglect. So I finally gave in this morning and banged out the little tidbit that follows in about 20 minutes. It’s the first time in a very long time indeed that I’ve felt that ecstatic gushing sensation when the words and the story seem to almost tell themselves. I haven’t written any fiction in longer than I care to admit, and in recent weeks even blogging has becoming something of a chore. (You may have noticed recent entries lack a certain spark… although I hope you haven’t!) Whatever value this fanfic trifle may or may not possess — and I’m not going to pretend it has much —  it’s at least demonstrated to me that something I’ve lately been fearing was lost forever is still there, somewhere deep down. I can still write, and I can still experience joy when I do it. Writing this was… reassuring. And I had fun while I was doing it. Surely that’s worth something, even if the result itself is lame, right?

I don’t want to ruin any surprises, so I won’t say any more by way of introduction, except to note that what I’ve created here is in the form of a screenplay. You’ll understand why as you get into it, I think…

spacer

O Captain, My Captain

It’s become a rather silly tradition here on Simple Tricks to honor the improbably proximate birthdays of William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy, a.k.a. Captain Kirk and Mr. Spock from the original Star Trek series.

No, wait… scratch that. It’s really not all that silly to honor these men, at least not to me. These two actors — whom the common wisdom holds aren’t even especially good actors, although I, of course, disagree — exerted a profound influence over my developing brain during my early childhood. I think I can say with a high degree of confidence that their science-fictional alter-egos were my very first childhood heroes, along with Lee Majors’ Six Million Dollar Man, Bugs Bunny, and Ernie from Sesame Street. I simply cannot recall a time when I’d never seen Star Trek. My mother has told me she used to watch the syndicated daily re-runs every afternoon while she did the housework, when I was but a toddler. One of my earliest memories is of talking to a little girl in my kindergarten class about a dream I’d had involving Spock. (That girl’s name was Annette, and I still see her around town once in a while… I wonder if she remembers that conversation as clearly as I do, or at all?) Another is of the way the circular patterns in our 1950s-vintage kitchen linoleum reminded me of transporter pads, and how I used to stand on them and “beam” myself to other places in the house or yard. (This was accomplished by standing still for a time while making a buzzing sound, then running like mad to wherever I was going, reassuming the same pose, and buzzing a little more until I “materialized.” Yeah, I was a weird kid. I’m sure my parents loved it.) I could go on with specific memories that range up through high school, college, and well into my adulthood, but you get the idea. Star Trek — the One True Star Trek, as I’ve begun to think of it in the dark years since the 2009 reboot movie added “lens flare” to the popular vocabulary — has always been a very big deal in my life. And Shatner and Nimoy, in a very real sense, are Star Trek, even today after umpteen spin-offs, movies, and a completely new cast.

Plus it just amuses me that these two guys, who are forever connected in the pop-cultural memory bank because of their signature roles, are also same age, within a couple days anyhow. The captain always leads, of course. Today is William Shatner’s 82nd birthday. Nimoy will achieve that same landmark on Tuesday.

I recently had the pleasure of seeing his one-man stage show, Shatner’s World: We Just Live in It, and it is my greatest wish to possess half this man’s vitality in another 40 years…

***IMAGE MISSING***

Happy birthday, Bill!

spacer

Why Can I Imagine My Dad Building One of These?

More to the point, why the heck hasn’t he built one of these, instead of resorting to his usual can-crushing method, which is to spread a bunch of them out on the driveway and drive over them with his Bobcat?

Nod to Sullivan’s Daily Dish for letting me see this.

spacer

Apollo’s F1 Engines Recovered from the Sea Floor

The Saturn V rocket boosters that sent the Apollo spacecraft to the Moon were incredible machines: immense in scale, mind-bogglingly complex in design, more powerful than any vehicle built before or since. If you don’t believe that particular superlative, here are some stats that might convince you: the F1 engine developed for the Saturns produced 1.5 million pounds of thrust, which amounts to 32 million horsepower. Compare that to my ’03 Mustang, a fairly peppy little ride on a meager 300 horses. And the Saturn V’s first stage, the one that actually lifted the whole stack off the ground and hurled it into the sky, was driven by five F1s. Think of it this way: The Saturns were gigantic, rampaging beasts harnessed and tamed to suit the dreams of we puny humans.

Sadly, there are only three of these Titans remaining, birds intended for the Moon that had their wings clipped when the Nixon administration shut down the Apollo program prematurely. They now stand — or, more accurately, lay, since they’re so huge, they’re more conveniently displayed horizontally — at Johnson and Kennedy Space Centers, and at the Huntsville Space and Rocket Center, all taxidermied examples of an extinct species. And remember, those are rockets that never got the chance to go anywhere. There are no examples of used Saturn V hardware on display anywhere in the world. The Saturns were never meant to return home after their one glorious flight. Their first stages fell into the Pacific Ocean; their second stages burned up when they re-entered Earth’s atmosphere; and the third stages that flung the Apollo capsules moonward were directed to either hit the Moon themselves, or were thrown out into space to get them out of the way. Unlike the Apollo command modules (two of which I’ve seen in person, including Apollo 11’s Columbia capsule, i.e., the one Neil Armstrong was on), you can’t stand in any museum in the world and look upon a Saturn that’s done its job and come back to tell us about it.

Not yet anyway. But maybe in a year or two…

An expedition financed by Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon.com and the spaceflight company Blue Origin — a friendly competitor to SpaceX — has found and recovered two mission-flown Saturn V F1 engines from three miles down in the Atlantic:

apollo_F-1_engine-recoveryBezos was aboard the salvage ship Seabed Worker during the search and recovery operation, and he describes a underwater graveyard of Saturn components, “an incredible sculpture garden of twisted F-1 engines that tells the story of a fiery and violent end.” The two units brought up by the team are rusty, shattered hulks, as you can see in the photo above, but Bezos’ intent is to restore them and get them into museums — the Smithsonian and Seattle’s Museum of Flight have been mentioned — where the hardware can “tell its true story, including its 5,000 mile per hour re-entry and subsequent impact with the ocean surface. We’re excited to get this hardware on display where just maybe it will inspire something amazing.”

Naturally, this being the age of cynical pragmatists with no sense of wonder, I’m seeing snarky online comments from people asking “why?” and “what’s the point?” and “couldn’t he have spent his money on something more useful?” (as if inspiring wonder in our children isn’t something useful). This attitude makes my eyelid twitch.

Look, it’s true… there probably isn’t any practical benefit to raising these things. I kind of doubt, for example, that they can provide any useful new information about how they performed or what stresses they were subjected to, at least not after 40-some years on the bottom of the ocean. I’m pretty sure the designers of the next generation of heavy-lift rockets have complete technical data on those engines already. But does everything we do these days have to carry a practical benefit, or a material return on investment, i.e., make a profit? With that attitude, why not just close the fricking Smithsonian right now? What’s the point of keeping all those dusty old planes, spacecraft, and machines when they could be recycled into toasters or something? (That actually happened to the vast majority of those majestic World War II bombers I love so much after they came home; the reason there’s only one airworthy B-24 Liberator left in the entire world isn’t because they were all shot down.) Isn’t it enough sometimes to simply do a thing because it’s neat, or because we want to? Isn’t it worth saving pieces of history simply because they’re interesting, or because they were part of something big? I don’t know… maybe it’s not. Maybe I’m weird. I’ve been called worse. But I know that I personally derive great value from being face to face with artifacts like this. It helps me establish a connection with the past. It makes events from the past feel real to me. And maybe that’s what kids these days — people in general — really need. To know that once this country reached for the stars and tried to do big things, and we succeeded. It wasn’t a hoax. It wasn’t boring. It was fire and ice and drama and risk and adventure and exploration. And all of that is still there for the taking, if we have the will to try for it again. Don’t tell me we can’t go back to the Moon, or on to Mars. Don’t tell me we can’t find better sources of energy, or figure out how to adapt to climate change (sorry, I don’t believe we can undo that one… it’s coming, and we’d better figure out how to live with it), or even find a way to make universal healthcare work. Once upon a time, we believed as a nation we could do anything we set our minds to. And who knows, maybe some kid might someday see these battered old relics, these formerly burning hearts of a spaceship that went to the frickin’ Moon, and believe that again, and find a way to solve those problems. It’s possible.

In any event, it’s Jeff Bezos’ money. Better he do something like this than stuff it all in some bank in the Caymans, or buy a sixth mansion or another Lambourghini or some damn extravagance like that. At least he’s pouring it into something that excites him and that he believes in. I believe in it, too.

If you’d like to read more about the F1 engines, NASA has an official statement here.

And on a somewhat related topic — okay, it’s not all that related, but it is about space stuff — The Atlantic has posted a pretty interesting interview with Eric Anderson, the co-founder of Planetary Resources. He talks about asteroid mining and settling Mars, and reasons why people might do both, and reasons why he thinks both are inevitable. And going to happen relatively soon, like soon enough that this fortysomething space nerd might actually live to see it. He makes some pretty heady predictions about the human future in space. People have been doing that my whole life, of course, but I really want to believe something might come of it this time. Guys like Anderson, and Bezos, and Elon Musk of SpaceX are pretty convincing. And I enjoy getting excited about this stuff again… not much else really seems to do that trick for me anymore…

spacer

The Mystery of the Moon Tower… SOLVED!

dazed-and-confused_poster

I read the other day that Dazed and Confused, Richard Linklater’s rambling cinematic ode to his own teenage life in the mid 1970s, is celebrating its 20th anniversary this year. Twenty years… holy crap. There are some pop-cultural landmarks that feel like 20 years (or more) really have passed, and then there are others that make me think I must’ve been frozen during a routine deep-space probe and blown into an orbit much more vast than originally planned, because surely that event just happened a couple weeks ago. Guess which one Dazed and Confused feels like to me? Maybe it’s some kind of psychosomatic effect from all the pot smoked in that film.

For the record, I wouldn’t call Dazed one of my favorite movies. I don’t have any particular memories, fond or otherwise, associated with it, and I don’t think it made any extraordinary impact on me. But I did enjoy it when I first saw it, and I’ve actually found it even funnier and more endearing on subsequent viewings, a genuine rarity when it comes to comic films. Like George Lucas’ American Graffiti (which Dazed and Confused resembles in many ways), the movie is essentially plotless, a series of vignettes that follow several groups of young people around during a very long summer night as they party, get into (relatively minor) trouble, and struggle to figure out what it’s all about as they near the inevitable transition into adulthood. Also like Lucas’ film, Dazed‘s real strength is less rooted in what happens than in the way it seems to authentically capture the textures and mood of a very specific and forever-gone moment in time — 1962 in Graffiti, 1976 in Dazed. (Personally, I think it’s kind of fun to imagine that the kids in Dazed are the children of the kids in Graffiti… the timing almost works.) And it’s one of the very few movies in which I’ve actually enjoyed Matthew McConnaughey’s performance. His delivery of that infamous line about liking high-school girls because they stay the same age while he gets older is pitch-perfect, just the right combination of eyebrow-waggling sleaze and good-natured cluelessness. It never fails to crack me up. (My appreciation of this joke is probably helped, in part, because I went through a similar phase in my own life. Yes, it’s true: I was one of those losers who continued hanging around my old alma mater for a time after I graduated. Most of my significant girlfriends — including The Girlfriend — were a couple grades behind me in school…)

There is one element of Dazed and Confused that’s always mystified me, though, and that’s the setting for the big kegger that fills the back half of the movie, a place the characters refer to as “the moon tower.” As seen in the film, the moon tower is a big metal structure in the middle of nowhere, with incredibly bright lights mounted on top of it. I’ve always assumed it was a radio or TV transmitter tower like we have around here, even though it looks nothing like the slender red-and-white columns with red aircraft warning lights blinking away to the west of my house, and the term “moon tower” was just a nickname bestowed by the local kids.

Totally wrong.

It turns out the moon tower seen in Dazed and Confused is a historical relic from the early days of electric lighting. Before the modern paradigm of incandescent (or, increasingly, LED) lamps at street level was worked out, many American cities experimented with placing large carbon-arc lamps on high towers that resembled oil derricks, so a relative handful of lights could illuminate entire neighborhoods from above. The effect was something like the light of a full moon, hence the structures became known as “moonlight towers” or “moon towers.” An elegant idea, but sadly, one that came with unforeseen problems, including animals being completely discombobulated — to the point of death, in some cases! — by the sudden and near-total banishment of nighttime. (The details are recounted in an interesting Atlantic article I ran across the other day.)

The age of artificial moonlight passed quickly and is hardly remembered today. But curiously enough, 17 moon towers still stand in and around Austin, Texas, where Richard Linklater went to college and where Dazed and Confused was filmed. Their light sources were long ago updated to common mercury-vapor lamps, but it makes me happy that such unique and oddball treasures survive somewhere. If nothing else, they’re useful reminders that we shouldn’t take for granted the way things are done, especially mundane things nobody thinks about anymore, like street lighting. It seems like our current system should’ve been the obvious solution to illuminating a city, but it wasn’t; it fascinates me to think what other ideas were tried out and abandoned…

(Hat tip: As with so many of the interesting links I’m finding these days, I spotted that Atlantic at Andrew Sullivan’s Daily Dish.)

spacer

You Have to Admire the Style…

Reading obituaries makes me sad. This, of course, is not an unexpected result of that particular activity. However the reason they make me sad is probably not the reason you think they might.

No, what actually saddens me about obituaries is how rote and mechanical they tend to be, how they take all the depth and complexity and richness that is a human life and beat it down to something resembling a job application. The meager handful of standard-issue bullet points — birth and death dates, names of parents and spouse(s), number of children, a note of military service (if any), positions held in the church (common in Utah obits), and maybe a mention of a well-loved hobby or career — do nothing to convey the flavor of the deceased person. I guess that’s more the job of the eulogy than the obituary, though. The obit is simply an announcement, and you have to go to the funeral to get some substance.

Still, it seems to me the final public summation of a person’s lifetime ought to reflect at least a little of the deceased’s personality, their philosophy and basic attitudes, their sense of humor, their resilience (or lack thereof) in the face of the life’s challenges, the adventures and experiences and preferences that defined them and that actually meant something to them. Every once in a blue moon, when somebody is willing to pay the exorbitant cost of an extra few precious column-inches, you’ll see something like that. And those exceptions to the general rule tend to linger in the memory… at least in my memory. For example, I still recall an obituary I read years ago, when I was in college. I didn’t know the deceased, but her obit made a big impression on me, for a number of reasons. She wasn’t much older than myself, for one thing; when you’re in your early twenties, hearing that somebody from your age cohort has died tends to really grab your attention. It’s profoundly unsettling to have mortality forcibly demonstrated to you at a time of life when you feel effectively immortal. Another thing that stood out was that this person had obviously written her own obituary — she’d had cancer, if I remember correctly, and had the time to prepare and see to the details herself — and I don’t recall that I’d ever seen that before. She’d been a very good writer and done a fine job of saying her farewells beautifully and eloquently. And of course, she’d been a fellow Trekkie, and had framed her thoughts around the familiar themes of that media franchise. I no longer remember exactly what she wrote — I wish I’d thought to clip this one and save it! — but I remember that she hoped her human adventure really was just beginning, and that she would be able to continue exploring the universe in some fashion. I remember getting a tight feeling in my throat as I read this stranger’s final statement because I understood so clearly what she was feeling, and I knew that had I ever actually met her, I would’ve liked her. I remember hoping that, when my time eventually and inevitably comes, I could have such a personal and effective send-off.

I still hope for that, actually, even as I fret that my grown-up life just isn’t that interesting, and that my bullet list of accomplishments isn’t long enough. That I wouldn’t like my answer to Jim Morrison’s famous question: “Did you have a good world when you died? Enough to base a movie on?”

But I digress… as I’m wont to do. Sorry about that.

I bring all this up because I’ve encountered another of those remarkable obituaries like that one I read back in college. This one has been floating around the various social media subnets this week, but I’m going to repost it here in case you’ve not seen it elsewhere. Again, it’s for someone I didn’t know, never met, never even imagined… until I read a few paragraphs that paint a vivid picture of a man who was funny, crotchety, contrary, sly, and entirely human. A man who lived a good life, a life worth mourning the loss of, even as we rejoice in its colorfulness. I don’t know if he wrote this obit for himself, or if it was done by a friend or family member. I don’t even know if it’s at all true. Regardless, it’s a real joy to read. And like any good movie trailer, it makes me want to know more about its subject… a man named Harry Stamps.

[Ed. note: I’ve edited this slightly to cut out the logistical details. If for some reasons you want to read it in its entirety, you can find it here.]

Harry Weathersby Stamps, ladies’ man, foodie, natty dresser, and accomplished traveler, died on Saturday, March 9, 2013.

 

Harry was locally sourcing his food years before chefs in California starting using cilantro and arugula (both of which he hated). For his signature bacon and tomato sandwich, he procured 100% all white Bunny Bread from Georgia, Blue Plate mayonnaise from New Orleans, Sauer’s black pepper from Virginia, home grown tomatoes from outside Oxford, and Tennessee’s Benton bacon from his bacon-of-the-month subscription. As a point of pride, he purported to remember every meal he had eaten in his 80 years of life.

 

The women in his life were numerous. He particularly fancied smart women. He loved his mom Wilma Hartzog (deceased), who with the help of her sisters and cousins in New Hebron reared Harry after his father Walter’s death when Harry was 12. He worshipped his older sister Lynn Stamps Garner (deceased), a character in her own right, and her daughter Lynda Lightsey of Hattiesburg. He married his main squeeze Ann Moore, a home economics teacher, almost 50 years ago, with whom they had two girls, Amanda Lewis of Dallas, and Alison of Starkville. He taught them to fish, to select a quality hammer, to love nature, and to just be thankful. He took great pride in stocking their tool boxes. One of his regrets was not seeing his girl, Hillary Clinton, elected President.

He had a life-long love affair with deviled eggs, Lane cakes, boiled peanuts, Vienna [Vi-e-na] sausages on saltines, his homemade canned fig preserves, pork chops, turnip greens, and buttermilk served in martini glasses garnished with cornbread.

 

He excelled at growing camellias, rebuilding houses after hurricanes, rocking, eradicating mole crickets from his front yard, composting pine needles, living within his means, outsmarting squirrels, never losing a game of competitive sickness, and reading any history book he could get his hands on. He loved to use his oversized “old man” remote control, which thankfully survived Hurricane Katrina, to flip between watching The Barefoot Contessa and anything on The History Channel. He took extreme pride in his two grandchildren Harper Lewis (8) and William Stamps Lewis (6) of Dallas for whom he would crow like a rooster on their phone calls. As a former government and sociology professor for Gulf Coast Community College, Harry was thoroughly interested in politics and religion and enjoyed watching politicians act like preachers and preachers act like politicians. He was fond of saying a phrase he coined “I am not running for political office or trying to get married” when he was “speaking the truth.” He also took pride in his service during the Korean conflict, serving the rank of corporal–just like Napolean, as he would say.

 

Harry took fashion cues from no one. His signature every day look was all his: a plain pocketed T-shirt designed by the fashion house Fruit of the Loom, his black-label elastic waist shorts worn above the navel and sold exclusively at the Sam’s on Highway 49, and a pair of old school Wallabees (who can even remember where he got those?) that were always paired with a grass-stained MSU baseball cap.

 

Harry traveled extensively. He only stayed in the finest quality AAA-rated campgrounds, his favorite being Indian Creek outside Cherokee, North Carolina. He always spent the extra money to upgrade to a creek view for his tent. Many years later he purchased a used pop-up camper for his family to travel in style, which spoiled his daughters for life.

 

He despised phonies, his 1969 Volvo (which he also loved), know-it-all Yankees, Southerners who used the words “veranda” and “porte cochere” to put on airs, eating grape leaves, Law and Order (all franchises), cats, and Martha Stewart. In reverse order. He particularly hated Day Light Saving Time, which he referred to as The Devil’s Time. It is not lost on his family that he died the very day that he would have had to spring his clock forward. This can only be viewed as his final protest.

Sounds like the sort of man to whom I’d like to say hello every morning as I slip onto a favorite stool at a comfortable neighborhood greasy spoon. The sort who’d have a different issue to discuss or story to tell every day… and for whom I’d be willing to be late for work, because it will surely take several cups of joe to get through it all. The sort whose life would make a decent movie, Jim Morrison.

I hope someday someone will say the same of me.

(Hat tip to Talking Points Memo.)

spacer

The Real Way to Tell Spring Is Coming

It’s got nothing to do with that poor, groggy Pennsylvania rodent that gets dragged out of his cozy den every year and held up in front of a camera, blinking like a video-game junkie emerging from a 36-hour World of Warcraft session. Poor Phil wouldn’t be anywhere near that harsh, brain-piercing daylight if it wasn’t for us impatient bipeds who can’t pay enough attention to the signs all around us and should be obvious if we’d only open our own bleary eyes. Signs such as these:

  • The sad final rind of filthy, gritty, grayish snow has finally melted from that spot on the front lawn that’s always shaded by the front of the house.
  • The kitty boys want to stay outside all day, and most of the night.
  • There’s a tremendous line at the carwash as everybody decides now is the time to hose off a three-month encrustation of road salt.
  • A gleaming yellow-and-white ’57 Chevy Bel Air pulls up next to you at a stoplight. Fifty-seven Bel Airs never have a three-month encrustation of salt on them, because they don’t leave the garage during the salty cold season.
  • You see people wearing shorts at Target. Granted, this is Utah and people here are weird, so you can see that at nearly anytime of the year, but they’re not wearing a parka over their shorts.

But you want to know the real indicator, the bottom-line, surefire, yep-there’s-no-going-back-now portent that we’ve finally broken the frigid back of Old Man Winter and those carefree summer days are right around the corner?

  • You drink your morning coffee to a serenade of about 257 Harley motorcycles rumbling past the house.

After the winter we’ve had, that’s sweeter music than “Moonlight Serenade” was to a 19-year-old private dancing his first dance back home after V-E Day. (Sorry. I’ve been watching a very long TV documentary on World War II lately…)

spacer

Right on the Nailhead

I’ve spent much time over the past few weekends trying to reorganize the dusty stacks of bankers boxes in my basement — the fabled “Bennion Archives” — into something a bit more useful, namely a kind of library, since most of those boxes contained books. And as I’ve gone about the huge task of unpacking the boxes and placing book after book onto cheap, thrift-store shelving, I’ve found myself experiencing successive waves of despair. The whole effort is driving home certain harsh realities that I’ve thought about in passing in recent years, but tried to avoid really confronting. You see, buying a book is an act of optimism in a way, because you anticipate having a future with this object: reading it, absorbing it, thinking about it, possessing it, displaying it, collecting it. It’s much like a first date, when you think about it. And I have gone on many, many first dates in the past 20 years, committed that act of optimism many, many times, because for a long time it brought me great joy to acquire more books. But just as dating begins to wear thin after a while if it never leads to anything deeper, I find the optimism and joy have largely drained out of my relationship with my books. The thing I keep thinking about now that I’m seeing them again, handling them again, is how few of my books I’ve actually read. Even worse, when I consider the ones I have read, I find my memory of them is hazy at best. Oh, I remember them as objects. In many cases, I have bright, shining memories of buying them — the location, the circumstances, who was with me at the time, the joy and rush of finding a book I’d been looking for, or that sounded like something I needed to own.

Something I needed to own. Not something I needed to read. That’s a key observation, isn’t it? But sticking to my point, of the books I have, in fact, read, I find I can’t recall what many of them were even about, beyond a simple premise  and an impression of whether or not I liked them. And that’s not how it used to be for me. I used to have a sharp memory of books I read, and movies I saw, and things I did. Not so much anymore. Now it seems like I’m already forgetting the details as soon as I’ve finished something. And I really hate that. I know my age is a factor in this. I’ve noticed lately that I can’t always find the words I want, or recall where I left my damn cellphone, and that seems perfectly normal for a busy fortysomething who has a lot of mundane demands on his mind… the same problems every fortysomething has, unless they’re the extraordinarily lucky type who have their shit together (I suspect these people are actually mythical). And I’m sure it doesn’t help that I read for a living eight or nine hours a day. There can’t be much focus left over after all that. And of course years of sleep deprivation are probably catching up with me too.

But all this is beside the point. The fact is, my relationship with books — with all the media I used to be so thoroughly immersed in, and so knowledgeable of — has changed. I’ve lost the deepness I once enjoyed, if that makes sense. And yes, it really troubles me. As I look at my library and my DVD collection and the stacks of VHS recordings I made 20 years ago, expecting to catch up someday with shows I didn’t have time to watch then — never imagining that entire decades would pass and I still wouldn’t have caught up with them — I feel overwhelmed. And sad. And more than a little foolish. There’s just too much of it all. I’ve replaced the quality of the experience with the quantity of my collections.

All of which is far more than I intended to write by way of introduction for a quote I ran across today… one of those observations that is so resonant with something you’ve been thinking or feeling, you almost feel a mechanical click somewhere inside your head when you first encounter it. Mr. W.H. Auden knew exactly what I’ve been struggling with as I shelve those books of mine, and mourn the loss of the specialness of books and other media:

“Again, while it is a great blessing that a man no longer has to be rich in order to enjoy the masterpieces of the past, for paperbacks, first-rate color reproductions, and stereo-phonograph records have made them available to all but the very poor, this ease of access, if misused — and we do misuse it — can become a curse. We are all of us tempted to read more books, look at more pictures, listen to more music than we can possibly absorb, and the result of such gluttony is not a cultured mind but a consuming one; what it reads, looks at, listens to is immediately forgotten, leaving no more traces behind than yesterday’s newspaper.”

Secondary Worlds (1967)

Guilty as charged. And yet, I just keep picking up more and more titles, or at least adding them to lists in the hope that I might get to them someday. Ten years ago, I basked in the pleasure of living in a time when pretty much any book or movie or TV show I could think of was — or at least soon would be — so easily available to own forever. What a ridiculous state of affairs, a true embarrassment of riches.

Spock was right. Having a thing is not so pleasing as wanting it.

Hat tip to Andrew Sullivan for sending me down this particular rabbit-hole.

spacer

Inspiration Mars: Let’s Do This!

inspiration-marsAfter writing the other day about Dennis Tito’s audacious proposal to send a man and a woman on a Martian fly-by in the year 2018, I’ve become somewhat obsessed with the idea. I think it’s the crystal-clear deadline that really sparks my enthusiasm. Lots of people and organizations talk about sending humans to Mars… someday. Twenty or thirty years from now. It seems like it’s always 20 years out, no matter how much time passes. But much like JFK’s famous Moon speech called for a definite timeframe to make the dream happen, Tito — and more importantly that immutable launch window for the fastest free-return trajectory — has drawn a distinct line in the sand: we go now, or not at all. And the fact that the line is only five years away cranks up the excitement levels. I’d love not to be in a nursing home when human eyes get that near to another planet for the first time.

I’ll tell you how enthused I am about this “Mission for America,” as Tito refers to it: I actually downloaded and read the feasibility study put together by the Inspiration Mars Foundation. For fun. Now, my field of expertise is obviously not anything that remotely resembles engineering, but I am a pretty big space nerd with a good feel for how a lot of this hardware works, and the study was obviously written with the non-rocket scientist in mind, so while certain tables and mathematical chatter flew right over my head, I understood the overall gist of it. And while the study’s authors concede that this was only a preliminary examination, and there are a lot of factors that need to be looked at much more rigorously before such a mission can proceed, the findings are convincing. We could do this. It’d push our current technology right up to the limit, and there’s no question it would be tremendously risky. (For instance, one thing the feasibility study brings up that I’ve never really thought about is is the matter of re-entry. They’re not all the same, you see, and the  planned trajectory for this Mars flight would bring the ship back into Earth’s atmosphere at far greater speeds than any other manned spacecraft has ever reached during re-entry, so the astronauts would experience very high g-loads — after a year-and-a-half of weightlessness, remember — and the heatshield would need to be very beefy. But this isn’t an insurmountable problem, just one that needs very careful planning.) Nevertheless, the study’s authors conclude that the mission is possible, and possible within the timeframe we have available. Using existing, state-of-the-art technology — nothing exotic that has to be designed and built from scratch, but things that are available now, or will be very shortly — we really could send a couple spinning around the backside of fracking Mars and bring them home again.

I’m going to go on the record right now and declare that I think we should do it. Or at least attempt it. And not just because I’m an aging child of the 1970s who grew up on Star Trek and Space: 1999 and legends of  the Apollo program and all the other space-related stuff of that era, and who still yearns to see some part of all that come to fruition (although there is, of course, more than a little truth in that accusation). I think we should try it because I believe this country needs something like this, some crazy, exciting dream that’s bigger than partisan politics, bigger than sports or entertainment media, something that will bring us together and give us all a shot of national pride and something to think about other than how shitty everything has become. It’s been decades since we had that sort of shared cultural experience. And things are so very bad right now. The only other time this country has been so at odds with itself, so divided into tribes that are so completely wary of every thing the other side thinks, says, and does, was on the eve of the Civil War. But a big symbolic “first” — especially one that’s not paid for by taxes the people of this nation no longer want to pay — carried out under the American flag might be just the thing to bring us all together again, at least for a little while.

Of course, the naysayers are already coming out of the woodwork, shouting that Tito is out of his mind, that it’s a scam, that he’ll never get the funding (have I mentioned that this is intended to be an entirely private venture?), or there’s not enough time to put it together, or — most  disheartening of all — that it’s a suicide mission. They’re saying that whatever lucky couple wins the seats aboard the Mars ship will never make back alive. And let’s be honest with ourselves, maybe they won’t. Five hundred days in a tin can going so far out into the void… that’s pretty dangerous. A lot of things could go wrong. But I wonder how many people in Portugal said it was suicide when Columbus announced he was going to sail west toward the very edge of the Earth? Or when some hunter-gatherer on the plains of Africa announced that he — or she, perhaps! — wanted to see what was on the other side of that ridge over there. Look, I’m an old-school Trekkie. I believe, in the immortal words of Captain Kirk, that risk is our business. That it’s worth taking a chance in the name of accomplishing a historic first and pushing back the boundaries of human experience and knowledge just a little bit more.

I have always considered myself an explorer at heart. I believe that that’s the basic nature of the human species, to want to know what’s over the horizon. But we get distracted, especially these days, when there are so many shiny things around us, and so many seemingly insurmountable problems weighing us down. We get caught up in the mundane worries of making of a living and keeping ourselves going on days when it seems like everything in the world wants to grind us into powder. And when that happens, we need an adventure — even if it’s only a vicarious one! — to break us out of our complacent ruts and help us rediscover what we really are. The human species needs to explore… to learn… to just see what’s out there. Robotic proxies can only fill so much of that need. At some point, we’ve got to see it with our own eyes.

I really hope this happens. If Tito asks for public donations, I’ll contribute. And I’ll keep watching for news from the foundation… and I’ll keep my fingers crossed that somehow, against all probability, this actually happens.

(Incidentally, if this venture intrigues you, I recommend this article on how it all came about…)

spacer

The Dragon Flies Again, and Misc. Space Stuff

If you haven’t heard, the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft arrived safely at the International Space Station early Sunday morning (8:56 AM Eastern time), marking its third successful flight (and second official cargo run) to the orbiting outpost. The trip was a bit bumpy this time out… following a flawless launch, the Dragon appeared for a time to be in serious trouble. The solar panels that supply electrical power for the vehicle refused to deploy, a problem that was traced back to another problem with pressurizing the craft’s thruster propellant tanks. (Briefly, Dragon needs to make a couple maneuvers before it opens its solar “wings”; no thrusters, no maneuvers, so the onboard computer refused to deploy the solar array.) Engineers at SpaceX figured out and corrected the problem within a few hours, putting the spacecraft behind schedule, but otherwise no harm was done. And really this mishap was a good thing, from a certain point of view: SpaceX has now proven that its people and its ship can confront major malfunctions and still get the job done. This wasn’t an Apollo 13-level disaster, but it was serious enough, and could have jeopardized the mission if the ground crews hadn’t figured it out. So good job, SpaceX!

If you’re interested in reading all the details of the launch and subsequent troubleshooting, Phil Plait (the Bad Astronomy guy) has a detailed play-by-play here. Dragon will remain at the ISS for three weeks, dropping off 2,300 pounds of cargo and bringing home some 3,000 pounds of test results and used equipment.

If that’s not exciting enough for you, here are a couple of other spaceflight tidbits that have caught my eye recently:

  • I’m sure everyone remembers the announcement last year that a company called Planetary Resources wants to mine near-Earth asteroids for fun and profit, a scheme that has been widely scorned by skeptics who don’t think it can be done, or don’t think it would be worth the cost. Well, skeptics be damned, there’s now another company throwing its hat into the asteroid-mining ring, a start-up called Deep Space Industries. Granted, neither company has revealed any truly detailed plans (let alone any kind of hardware that’s ready to fly), but the mere fact that people are talking seriously about attempting something that I grew up reading about in sci-fi novels, and that there are now two companies competing to try it… well, I’m excited about the possibilities. Asteroid mining really does seem feasible to me, if not right away, then within a few years, and it’s an offworld activity that has — or could have, anyhow — some genuine practical value beyond high-minded ideas about exploration for its own sake. Hell, that meteorite over Russia a couple weeks ago ought to be proof enough that there are big rocks in the sky all around us, we may as well try to put them to use. God knows we’re rapidly using up everything down here.
  • Finally, did you hear that Dennis Tito, the gazillionaire who paid his own way into the history books as the first space tourist back in 2001, has set up a foundation with the aim of sending a man and a woman on a close-approach fly-by of the planet Mars in 2018? That’s when a planetary alignment between Earth and Mars that occurs only twice every 15 years will (theoretically) enable a relatively brief round-trip journey of 501 days. The idea is to send a middle-aged married couple who are beyond child-bearing age — probably, I would guess, because the radiation they’ll be exposed to will make them infertile — on a low-fuel “free return” course that will take them within 100 miles of the Martian surface before slingshoting them back home. A free-return orbit will ensure that their spacecraft makes it back regardless of any malfunction… including a worst-case scenario where the crew doesn’t survive. (Go rewatch Apollo 13 — getting into a free-return was the point of them doing that dramatic thruster burn behind the back side of the Moon.) Can an expedition of this magnitude really happen in only five years? Damned if I know… it certainly seems like a long shot. But a lot of the necessary hardware is already in development, which ought to help. SpaceX is working up a heavy-lift version of its Falcon-9 booster — the same one that has successfully shot Dragon into space four times now, as well as commercial payloads — that is supposed to be capable of sending a craft into deep space, and that should be ready in time. As for a spacecraft, there are several capsule-style vehicles under construction now, including a human-rated version of Dragon, but they’re all pretty damn cozy for such a long trip. I’ve seen an artist’s conception of a Mars craft with a Bigelow inflatable module attached for some expanded living space, but even an arrangement like that will no doubt become pretty claustrophobic after a year and a half. Whatever lucky couple wins the lottery will have their marriage put to the ultimate test, I think. And I have no idea if our current life-support technology is up to the job. What about food supplies for that long a flight? And again, there’s the radiation to contend with, once our intrepid Marsnauts leave Earth’s protective magnetic field. (The Apollo astronauts faced that problem too, but they were only exposed for a few days, not 18 months.) The launch window apparently coincides with a period of low solar activity, and I’ve read that older people would have less risk of developing cancer than younger astronauts (because they don’t have as many years left for it to develop), but still…  a mere five years really doesn’t seem like enough time to prepare for something like this, does it? Nevertheless, I tend to agree with Tito’s thinking that a big, bold proposal to do something no human has ever done before is something worth investigating. If it succeeds — a big if, I grant — but if, imagine what this could do for the pride of a nation that’s been battered pretty badly in the last couple of decades. And just imagine being one of those two people, seeing a whole new planet in person. The first people in all of history to do so. It would be… awesome. In the original, pre-1980s-slang sense of that word. Like the old ad campaign once promised, the human adventure is just beginning…

I’m always saying that this isn’t the future I was promised as a kid, but maybe that future is still on the way. Maybe it just got pushed out a bit, and I’ll still live long enough to see at least some of it come true, even if I won’t be among those making it happen…

spacer