Monthly Archives: March 2013

All Right, Now You’re Overacting…

You want to know why fans of the original Star Trek such as myself love William Shatner so much? It’s because of stuff like this:

This has been making the rounds today and I found myself laughing as hard on the sixth viewing as the first. You don’t see Patrick Stewart doing this sort of thing. I’m just sayin’.

(Actually, from what I know about him, Stewart probably would do a good-natured, self-deprecating advertisement like this. It’s just that his show — Star Trek: The Next Generation, for my non-Trekkie Loyal Readers — never produced a scene as iconic — or, admittedly, as corny to modern eyes — as the legendary Kirk vs. Gorn confrontation from the original-series episode “Arena.” Which, incidentally, is one of my favorites, despite the obvious shortcomings. Great message and, in context, surprisingly tense storytelling.)

But you know what’s really cool about Shatner doing this ad? Besides his willingness to poke fun at his age, I mean? The game he’s shilling for isn’t even based on his version of Trek. The characters and scenery are obviously modeled on the Abrams reboot. And unlike his costar Leonard Nimoy, Shatner didn’t even have a cameo in the reboot flick. (It probably says something about Abrams-Trek that an ad for a tie-in game is trying to cash in on the good will fans have toward the original Star Trek, rather than using actors or scenes from the rebooted series. Or am I just being churlish?)

Finally, speaking of Shatner’s age, does he look great for a man of 82 or what? We should all age so gracefully…

spacer

Surely… the Best of Times

Coming hot on the heels of his co-star and partner-in-nerdy-fame William Shatner’s eighty-second birthday, Leonard Nimoy hits 82 himself today. To celebrate, here’s a photo of him with a little kitty:

leonard-nimoy_w_cat

In the Shatner entry the other day, I said something about the influence he and Nimoy have exerted on me over the years. Here’s another example for you: some of the technical material I’ve been proofreading at work lately uses the word “sensor” fairly liberally. Every time I see that word in the copy, I don’t hear it in my mind the way most people say it, i.e., “sens-er.” Instead, I hear it in Nimoy’s voice, with his somewhat idiosyncratic way of saying the word in countless episodes of Star Trek, “sens-orrrrr.” I find that amusing. So happy birthday, Leonard… thanks for the pronunciation!

spacer

Wherein I Commit My First Act of Fanfic…

I’ve engaged with my various media-related obsessions in lots of different ways over the years, but I must confess I’ve never had much use for fan fiction, better-known in geeky circles as “fanfic.”

No offense if fanfic is your thing; it’s just never been my thing. As far as writing goes, I’ve always thought my time and energies ought to be spent working on my own original ideas rather than playing in someone else’s sandbox. And when it comes to reading fanfic… well, I haven’t delved very deeply into the scene, but what I’ve encountered by chance has been all over the map in terms of quality, with the low end being really astonishingly painful, and often the themes or scenarios being explored do not speak to my interests, assuming they don’t outright contradict my understanding of the parent property. (For instance, so-called “slash” fiction — which I understand is a common subcategory of fanfic — offends my sensibilities not because it depicts same-sex relationships, but because the characters involved are usually not defined as homosexual in the original source material. Kirk and Spock, the stars of the earliest documented slash stories that I know of, are not gay; there is no on-screen evidence anywhere that they have same-sex attractions toward anybody, let alone each other, so stories in which they get together don’t pass muster with my suspension of disbelief. They’re just not plausible in my mind.) So, yeah, not into fanfic.

Which means that I am rather chagrined as I announce that I have, in fact, just written a piece of it myself.

I didn’t really intend to… and I don’t know that I ever will again. It’s just that I had this idea a while back, and it’s steadfastly refused to leave my imagination alone, even after months of neglect. So I finally gave in this morning and banged out the little tidbit that follows in about 20 minutes. It’s the first time in a very long time indeed that I’ve felt that ecstatic gushing sensation when the words and the story seem to almost tell themselves. I haven’t written any fiction in longer than I care to admit, and in recent weeks even blogging has becoming something of a chore. (You may have noticed recent entries lack a certain spark… although I hope you haven’t!) Whatever value this fanfic trifle may or may not possess — and I’m not going to pretend it has much —  it’s at least demonstrated to me that something I’ve lately been fearing was lost forever is still there, somewhere deep down. I can still write, and I can still experience joy when I do it. Writing this was… reassuring. And I had fun while I was doing it. Surely that’s worth something, even if the result itself is lame, right?

I don’t want to ruin any surprises, so I won’t say any more by way of introduction, except to note that what I’ve created here is in the form of a screenplay. You’ll understand why as you get into it, I think…

spacer

O Captain, My Captain

It’s become a rather silly tradition here on Simple Tricks to honor the improbably proximate birthdays of William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy, a.k.a. Captain Kirk and Mr. Spock from the original Star Trek series.

No, wait… scratch that. It’s really not all that silly to honor these men, at least not to me. These two actors — whom the common wisdom holds aren’t even especially good actors, although I, of course, disagree — exerted a profound influence over my developing brain during my early childhood. I think I can say with a high degree of confidence that their science-fictional alter-egos were my very first childhood heroes, along with Lee Majors’ Six Million Dollar Man, Bugs Bunny, and Ernie from Sesame Street. I simply cannot recall a time when I’d never seen Star Trek. My mother has told me she used to watch the syndicated daily re-runs every afternoon while she did the housework, when I was but a toddler. One of my earliest memories is of talking to a little girl in my kindergarten class about a dream I’d had involving Spock. (That girl’s name was Annette, and I still see her around town once in a while… I wonder if she remembers that conversation as clearly as I do, or at all?) Another is of the way the circular patterns in our 1950s-vintage kitchen linoleum reminded me of transporter pads, and how I used to stand on them and “beam” myself to other places in the house or yard. (This was accomplished by standing still for a time while making a buzzing sound, then running like mad to wherever I was going, reassuming the same pose, and buzzing a little more until I “materialized.” Yeah, I was a weird kid. I’m sure my parents loved it.) I could go on with specific memories that range up through high school, college, and well into my adulthood, but you get the idea. Star Trek — the One True Star Trek, as I’ve begun to think of it in the dark years since the 2009 reboot movie added “lens flare” to the popular vocabulary — has always been a very big deal in my life. And Shatner and Nimoy, in a very real sense, are Star Trek, even today after umpteen spin-offs, movies, and a completely new cast.

Plus it just amuses me that these two guys, who are forever connected in the pop-cultural memory bank because of their signature roles, are also same age, within a couple days anyhow. The captain always leads, of course. Today is William Shatner’s 82nd birthday. Nimoy will achieve that same landmark on Tuesday.

I recently had the pleasure of seeing his one-man stage show, Shatner’s World: We Just Live in It, and it is my greatest wish to possess half this man’s vitality in another 40 years…

***IMAGE MISSING***

Happy birthday, Bill!

spacer

Why Can I Imagine My Dad Building One of These?

More to the point, why the heck hasn’t he built one of these, instead of resorting to his usual can-crushing method, which is to spread a bunch of them out on the driveway and drive over them with his Bobcat?

Nod to Sullivan’s Daily Dish for letting me see this.

spacer

Apollo’s F1 Engines Recovered from the Sea Floor

The Saturn V rocket boosters that sent the Apollo spacecraft to the Moon were incredible machines: immense in scale, mind-bogglingly complex in design, more powerful than any vehicle built before or since. If you don’t believe that particular superlative, here are some stats that might convince you: the F1 engine developed for the Saturns produced 1.5 million pounds of thrust, which amounts to 32 million horsepower. Compare that to my ’03 Mustang, a fairly peppy little ride on a meager 300 horses. And the Saturn V’s first stage, the one that actually lifted the whole stack off the ground and hurled it into the sky, was driven by five F1s. Think of it this way: The Saturns were gigantic, rampaging beasts harnessed and tamed to suit the dreams of we puny humans.

Sadly, there are only three of these Titans remaining, birds intended for the Moon that had their wings clipped when the Nixon administration shut down the Apollo program prematurely. They now stand — or, more accurately, lay, since they’re so huge, they’re more conveniently displayed horizontally — at Johnson and Kennedy Space Centers, and at the Huntsville Space and Rocket Center, all taxidermied examples of an extinct species. And remember, those are rockets that never got the chance to go anywhere. There are no examples of used Saturn V hardware on display anywhere in the world. The Saturns were never meant to return home after their one glorious flight. Their first stages fell into the Pacific Ocean; their second stages burned up when they re-entered Earth’s atmosphere; and the third stages that flung the Apollo capsules moonward were directed to either hit the Moon themselves, or were thrown out into space to get them out of the way. Unlike the Apollo command modules (two of which I’ve seen in person, including Apollo 11’s Columbia capsule, i.e., the one Neil Armstrong was on), you can’t stand in any museum in the world and look upon a Saturn that’s done its job and come back to tell us about it.

Not yet anyway. But maybe in a year or two…

An expedition financed by Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon.com and the spaceflight company Blue Origin — a friendly competitor to SpaceX — has found and recovered two mission-flown Saturn V F1 engines from three miles down in the Atlantic:

apollo_F-1_engine-recoveryBezos was aboard the salvage ship Seabed Worker during the search and recovery operation, and he describes a underwater graveyard of Saturn components, “an incredible sculpture garden of twisted F-1 engines that tells the story of a fiery and violent end.” The two units brought up by the team are rusty, shattered hulks, as you can see in the photo above, but Bezos’ intent is to restore them and get them into museums — the Smithsonian and Seattle’s Museum of Flight have been mentioned — where the hardware can “tell its true story, including its 5,000 mile per hour re-entry and subsequent impact with the ocean surface. We’re excited to get this hardware on display where just maybe it will inspire something amazing.”

Naturally, this being the age of cynical pragmatists with no sense of wonder, I’m seeing snarky online comments from people asking “why?” and “what’s the point?” and “couldn’t he have spent his money on something more useful?” (as if inspiring wonder in our children isn’t something useful). This attitude makes my eyelid twitch.

Look, it’s true… there probably isn’t any practical benefit to raising these things. I kind of doubt, for example, that they can provide any useful new information about how they performed or what stresses they were subjected to, at least not after 40-some years on the bottom of the ocean. I’m pretty sure the designers of the next generation of heavy-lift rockets have complete technical data on those engines already. But does everything we do these days have to carry a practical benefit, or a material return on investment, i.e., make a profit? With that attitude, why not just close the fricking Smithsonian right now? What’s the point of keeping all those dusty old planes, spacecraft, and machines when they could be recycled into toasters or something? (That actually happened to the vast majority of those majestic World War II bombers I love so much after they came home; the reason there’s only one airworthy B-24 Liberator left in the entire world isn’t because they were all shot down.) Isn’t it enough sometimes to simply do a thing because it’s neat, or because we want to? Isn’t it worth saving pieces of history simply because they’re interesting, or because they were part of something big? I don’t know… maybe it’s not. Maybe I’m weird. I’ve been called worse. But I know that I personally derive great value from being face to face with artifacts like this. It helps me establish a connection with the past. It makes events from the past feel real to me. And maybe that’s what kids these days — people in general — really need. To know that once this country reached for the stars and tried to do big things, and we succeeded. It wasn’t a hoax. It wasn’t boring. It was fire and ice and drama and risk and adventure and exploration. And all of that is still there for the taking, if we have the will to try for it again. Don’t tell me we can’t go back to the Moon, or on to Mars. Don’t tell me we can’t find better sources of energy, or figure out how to adapt to climate change (sorry, I don’t believe we can undo that one… it’s coming, and we’d better figure out how to live with it), or even find a way to make universal healthcare work. Once upon a time, we believed as a nation we could do anything we set our minds to. And who knows, maybe some kid might someday see these battered old relics, these formerly burning hearts of a spaceship that went to the frickin’ Moon, and believe that again, and find a way to solve those problems. It’s possible.

In any event, it’s Jeff Bezos’ money. Better he do something like this than stuff it all in some bank in the Caymans, or buy a sixth mansion or another Lambourghini or some damn extravagance like that. At least he’s pouring it into something that excites him and that he believes in. I believe in it, too.

If you’d like to read more about the F1 engines, NASA has an official statement here.

And on a somewhat related topic — okay, it’s not all that related, but it is about space stuff — The Atlantic has posted a pretty interesting interview with Eric Anderson, the co-founder of Planetary Resources. He talks about asteroid mining and settling Mars, and reasons why people might do both, and reasons why he thinks both are inevitable. And going to happen relatively soon, like soon enough that this fortysomething space nerd might actually live to see it. He makes some pretty heady predictions about the human future in space. People have been doing that my whole life, of course, but I really want to believe something might come of it this time. Guys like Anderson, and Bezos, and Elon Musk of SpaceX are pretty convincing. And I enjoy getting excited about this stuff again… not much else really seems to do that trick for me anymore…

spacer

The Mystery of the Moon Tower… SOLVED!

dazed-and-confused_poster

I read the other day that Dazed and Confused, Richard Linklater’s rambling cinematic ode to his own teenage life in the mid 1970s, is celebrating its 20th anniversary this year. Twenty years… holy crap. There are some pop-cultural landmarks that feel like 20 years (or more) really have passed, and then there are others that make me think I must’ve been frozen during a routine deep-space probe and blown into an orbit much more vast than originally planned, because surely that event just happened a couple weeks ago. Guess which one Dazed and Confused feels like to me? Maybe it’s some kind of psychosomatic effect from all the pot smoked in that film.

For the record, I wouldn’t call Dazed one of my favorite movies. I don’t have any particular memories, fond or otherwise, associated with it, and I don’t think it made any extraordinary impact on me. But I did enjoy it when I first saw it, and I’ve actually found it even funnier and more endearing on subsequent viewings, a genuine rarity when it comes to comic films. Like George Lucas’ American Graffiti (which Dazed and Confused resembles in many ways), the movie is essentially plotless, a series of vignettes that follow several groups of young people around during a very long summer night as they party, get into (relatively minor) trouble, and struggle to figure out what it’s all about as they near the inevitable transition into adulthood. Also like Lucas’ film, Dazed‘s real strength is less rooted in what happens than in the way it seems to authentically capture the textures and mood of a very specific and forever-gone moment in time — 1962 in Graffiti, 1976 in Dazed. (Personally, I think it’s kind of fun to imagine that the kids in Dazed are the children of the kids in Graffiti… the timing almost works.) And it’s one of the very few movies in which I’ve actually enjoyed Matthew McConnaughey’s performance. His delivery of that infamous line about liking high-school girls because they stay the same age while he gets older is pitch-perfect, just the right combination of eyebrow-waggling sleaze and good-natured cluelessness. It never fails to crack me up. (My appreciation of this joke is probably helped, in part, because I went through a similar phase in my own life. Yes, it’s true: I was one of those losers who continued hanging around my old alma mater for a time after I graduated. Most of my significant girlfriends — including The Girlfriend — were a couple grades behind me in school…)

There is one element of Dazed and Confused that’s always mystified me, though, and that’s the setting for the big kegger that fills the back half of the movie, a place the characters refer to as “the moon tower.” As seen in the film, the moon tower is a big metal structure in the middle of nowhere, with incredibly bright lights mounted on top of it. I’ve always assumed it was a radio or TV transmitter tower like we have around here, even though it looks nothing like the slender red-and-white columns with red aircraft warning lights blinking away to the west of my house, and the term “moon tower” was just a nickname bestowed by the local kids.

Totally wrong.

It turns out the moon tower seen in Dazed and Confused is a historical relic from the early days of electric lighting. Before the modern paradigm of incandescent (or, increasingly, LED) lamps at street level was worked out, many American cities experimented with placing large carbon-arc lamps on high towers that resembled oil derricks, so a relative handful of lights could illuminate entire neighborhoods from above. The effect was something like the light of a full moon, hence the structures became known as “moonlight towers” or “moon towers.” An elegant idea, but sadly, one that came with unforeseen problems, including animals being completely discombobulated — to the point of death, in some cases! — by the sudden and near-total banishment of nighttime. (The details are recounted in an interesting Atlantic article I ran across the other day.)

The age of artificial moonlight passed quickly and is hardly remembered today. But curiously enough, 17 moon towers still stand in and around Austin, Texas, where Richard Linklater went to college and where Dazed and Confused was filmed. Their light sources were long ago updated to common mercury-vapor lamps, but it makes me happy that such unique and oddball treasures survive somewhere. If nothing else, they’re useful reminders that we shouldn’t take for granted the way things are done, especially mundane things nobody thinks about anymore, like street lighting. It seems like our current system should’ve been the obvious solution to illuminating a city, but it wasn’t; it fascinates me to think what other ideas were tried out and abandoned…

(Hat tip: As with so many of the interesting links I’m finding these days, I spotted that Atlantic at Andrew Sullivan’s Daily Dish.)

spacer

You Have to Admire the Style…

Reading obituaries makes me sad. This, of course, is not an unexpected result of that particular activity. However the reason they make me sad is probably not the reason you think they might.

No, what actually saddens me about obituaries is how rote and mechanical they tend to be, how they take all the depth and complexity and richness that is a human life and beat it down to something resembling a job application. The meager handful of standard-issue bullet points — birth and death dates, names of parents and spouse(s), number of children, a note of military service (if any), positions held in the church (common in Utah obits), and maybe a mention of a well-loved hobby or career — do nothing to convey the flavor of the deceased person. I guess that’s more the job of the eulogy than the obituary, though. The obit is simply an announcement, and you have to go to the funeral to get some substance.

Still, it seems to me the final public summation of a person’s lifetime ought to reflect at least a little of the deceased’s personality, their philosophy and basic attitudes, their sense of humor, their resilience (or lack thereof) in the face of the life’s challenges, the adventures and experiences and preferences that defined them and that actually meant something to them. Every once in a blue moon, when somebody is willing to pay the exorbitant cost of an extra few precious column-inches, you’ll see something like that. And those exceptions to the general rule tend to linger in the memory… at least in my memory. For example, I still recall an obituary I read years ago, when I was in college. I didn’t know the deceased, but her obit made a big impression on me, for a number of reasons. She wasn’t much older than myself, for one thing; when you’re in your early twenties, hearing that somebody from your age cohort has died tends to really grab your attention. It’s profoundly unsettling to have mortality forcibly demonstrated to you at a time of life when you feel effectively immortal. Another thing that stood out was that this person had obviously written her own obituary — she’d had cancer, if I remember correctly, and had the time to prepare and see to the details herself — and I don’t recall that I’d ever seen that before. She’d been a very good writer and done a fine job of saying her farewells beautifully and eloquently. And of course, she’d been a fellow Trekkie, and had framed her thoughts around the familiar themes of that media franchise. I no longer remember exactly what she wrote — I wish I’d thought to clip this one and save it! — but I remember that she hoped her human adventure really was just beginning, and that she would be able to continue exploring the universe in some fashion. I remember getting a tight feeling in my throat as I read this stranger’s final statement because I understood so clearly what she was feeling, and I knew that had I ever actually met her, I would’ve liked her. I remember hoping that, when my time eventually and inevitably comes, I could have such a personal and effective send-off.

I still hope for that, actually, even as I fret that my grown-up life just isn’t that interesting, and that my bullet list of accomplishments isn’t long enough. That I wouldn’t like my answer to Jim Morrison’s famous question: “Did you have a good world when you died? Enough to base a movie on?”

But I digress… as I’m wont to do. Sorry about that.

I bring all this up because I’ve encountered another of those remarkable obituaries like that one I read back in college. This one has been floating around the various social media subnets this week, but I’m going to repost it here in case you’ve not seen it elsewhere. Again, it’s for someone I didn’t know, never met, never even imagined… until I read a few paragraphs that paint a vivid picture of a man who was funny, crotchety, contrary, sly, and entirely human. A man who lived a good life, a life worth mourning the loss of, even as we rejoice in its colorfulness. I don’t know if he wrote this obit for himself, or if it was done by a friend or family member. I don’t even know if it’s at all true. Regardless, it’s a real joy to read. And like any good movie trailer, it makes me want to know more about its subject… a man named Harry Stamps.

[Ed. note: I’ve edited this slightly to cut out the logistical details. If for some reasons you want to read it in its entirety, you can find it here.]

Harry Weathersby Stamps, ladies’ man, foodie, natty dresser, and accomplished traveler, died on Saturday, March 9, 2013.

 

Harry was locally sourcing his food years before chefs in California starting using cilantro and arugula (both of which he hated). For his signature bacon and tomato sandwich, he procured 100% all white Bunny Bread from Georgia, Blue Plate mayonnaise from New Orleans, Sauer’s black pepper from Virginia, home grown tomatoes from outside Oxford, and Tennessee’s Benton bacon from his bacon-of-the-month subscription. As a point of pride, he purported to remember every meal he had eaten in his 80 years of life.

 

The women in his life were numerous. He particularly fancied smart women. He loved his mom Wilma Hartzog (deceased), who with the help of her sisters and cousins in New Hebron reared Harry after his father Walter’s death when Harry was 12. He worshipped his older sister Lynn Stamps Garner (deceased), a character in her own right, and her daughter Lynda Lightsey of Hattiesburg. He married his main squeeze Ann Moore, a home economics teacher, almost 50 years ago, with whom they had two girls, Amanda Lewis of Dallas, and Alison of Starkville. He taught them to fish, to select a quality hammer, to love nature, and to just be thankful. He took great pride in stocking their tool boxes. One of his regrets was not seeing his girl, Hillary Clinton, elected President.

He had a life-long love affair with deviled eggs, Lane cakes, boiled peanuts, Vienna [Vi-e-na] sausages on saltines, his homemade canned fig preserves, pork chops, turnip greens, and buttermilk served in martini glasses garnished with cornbread.

 

He excelled at growing camellias, rebuilding houses after hurricanes, rocking, eradicating mole crickets from his front yard, composting pine needles, living within his means, outsmarting squirrels, never losing a game of competitive sickness, and reading any history book he could get his hands on. He loved to use his oversized “old man” remote control, which thankfully survived Hurricane Katrina, to flip between watching The Barefoot Contessa and anything on The History Channel. He took extreme pride in his two grandchildren Harper Lewis (8) and William Stamps Lewis (6) of Dallas for whom he would crow like a rooster on their phone calls. As a former government and sociology professor for Gulf Coast Community College, Harry was thoroughly interested in politics and religion and enjoyed watching politicians act like preachers and preachers act like politicians. He was fond of saying a phrase he coined “I am not running for political office or trying to get married” when he was “speaking the truth.” He also took pride in his service during the Korean conflict, serving the rank of corporal–just like Napolean, as he would say.

 

Harry took fashion cues from no one. His signature every day look was all his: a plain pocketed T-shirt designed by the fashion house Fruit of the Loom, his black-label elastic waist shorts worn above the navel and sold exclusively at the Sam’s on Highway 49, and a pair of old school Wallabees (who can even remember where he got those?) that were always paired with a grass-stained MSU baseball cap.

 

Harry traveled extensively. He only stayed in the finest quality AAA-rated campgrounds, his favorite being Indian Creek outside Cherokee, North Carolina. He always spent the extra money to upgrade to a creek view for his tent. Many years later he purchased a used pop-up camper for his family to travel in style, which spoiled his daughters for life.

 

He despised phonies, his 1969 Volvo (which he also loved), know-it-all Yankees, Southerners who used the words “veranda” and “porte cochere” to put on airs, eating grape leaves, Law and Order (all franchises), cats, and Martha Stewart. In reverse order. He particularly hated Day Light Saving Time, which he referred to as The Devil’s Time. It is not lost on his family that he died the very day that he would have had to spring his clock forward. This can only be viewed as his final protest.

Sounds like the sort of man to whom I’d like to say hello every morning as I slip onto a favorite stool at a comfortable neighborhood greasy spoon. The sort who’d have a different issue to discuss or story to tell every day… and for whom I’d be willing to be late for work, because it will surely take several cups of joe to get through it all. The sort whose life would make a decent movie, Jim Morrison.

I hope someday someone will say the same of me.

(Hat tip to Talking Points Memo.)

spacer

The Real Way to Tell Spring Is Coming

It’s got nothing to do with that poor, groggy Pennsylvania rodent that gets dragged out of his cozy den every year and held up in front of a camera, blinking like a video-game junkie emerging from a 36-hour World of Warcraft session. Poor Phil wouldn’t be anywhere near that harsh, brain-piercing daylight if it wasn’t for us impatient bipeds who can’t pay enough attention to the signs all around us and should be obvious if we’d only open our own bleary eyes. Signs such as these:

  • The sad final rind of filthy, gritty, grayish snow has finally melted from that spot on the front lawn that’s always shaded by the front of the house.
  • The kitty boys want to stay outside all day, and most of the night.
  • There’s a tremendous line at the carwash as everybody decides now is the time to hose off a three-month encrustation of road salt.
  • A gleaming yellow-and-white ’57 Chevy Bel Air pulls up next to you at a stoplight. Fifty-seven Bel Airs never have a three-month encrustation of salt on them, because they don’t leave the garage during the salty cold season.
  • You see people wearing shorts at Target. Granted, this is Utah and people here are weird, so you can see that at nearly anytime of the year, but they’re not wearing a parka over their shorts.

But you want to know the real indicator, the bottom-line, surefire, yep-there’s-no-going-back-now portent that we’ve finally broken the frigid back of Old Man Winter and those carefree summer days are right around the corner?

  • You drink your morning coffee to a serenade of about 257 Harley motorcycles rumbling past the house.

After the winter we’ve had, that’s sweeter music than “Moonlight Serenade” was to a 19-year-old private dancing his first dance back home after V-E Day. (Sorry. I’ve been watching a very long TV documentary on World War II lately…)

spacer

Right on the Nailhead

I’ve spent much time over the past few weekends trying to reorganize the dusty stacks of bankers boxes in my basement — the fabled “Bennion Archives” — into something a bit more useful, namely a kind of library, since most of those boxes contained books. And as I’ve gone about the huge task of unpacking the boxes and placing book after book onto cheap, thrift-store shelving, I’ve found myself experiencing successive waves of despair. The whole effort is driving home certain harsh realities that I’ve thought about in passing in recent years, but tried to avoid really confronting. You see, buying a book is an act of optimism in a way, because you anticipate having a future with this object: reading it, absorbing it, thinking about it, possessing it, displaying it, collecting it. It’s much like a first date, when you think about it. And I have gone on many, many first dates in the past 20 years, committed that act of optimism many, many times, because for a long time it brought me great joy to acquire more books. But just as dating begins to wear thin after a while if it never leads to anything deeper, I find the optimism and joy have largely drained out of my relationship with my books. The thing I keep thinking about now that I’m seeing them again, handling them again, is how few of my books I’ve actually read. Even worse, when I consider the ones I have read, I find my memory of them is hazy at best. Oh, I remember them as objects. In many cases, I have bright, shining memories of buying them — the location, the circumstances, who was with me at the time, the joy and rush of finding a book I’d been looking for, or that sounded like something I needed to own.

Something I needed to own. Not something I needed to read. That’s a key observation, isn’t it? But sticking to my point, of the books I have, in fact, read, I find I can’t recall what many of them were even about, beyond a simple premise  and an impression of whether or not I liked them. And that’s not how it used to be for me. I used to have a sharp memory of books I read, and movies I saw, and things I did. Not so much anymore. Now it seems like I’m already forgetting the details as soon as I’ve finished something. And I really hate that. I know my age is a factor in this. I’ve noticed lately that I can’t always find the words I want, or recall where I left my damn cellphone, and that seems perfectly normal for a busy fortysomething who has a lot of mundane demands on his mind… the same problems every fortysomething has, unless they’re the extraordinarily lucky type who have their shit together (I suspect these people are actually mythical). And I’m sure it doesn’t help that I read for a living eight or nine hours a day. There can’t be much focus left over after all that. And of course years of sleep deprivation are probably catching up with me too.

But all this is beside the point. The fact is, my relationship with books — with all the media I used to be so thoroughly immersed in, and so knowledgeable of — has changed. I’ve lost the deepness I once enjoyed, if that makes sense. And yes, it really troubles me. As I look at my library and my DVD collection and the stacks of VHS recordings I made 20 years ago, expecting to catch up someday with shows I didn’t have time to watch then — never imagining that entire decades would pass and I still wouldn’t have caught up with them — I feel overwhelmed. And sad. And more than a little foolish. There’s just too much of it all. I’ve replaced the quality of the experience with the quantity of my collections.

All of which is far more than I intended to write by way of introduction for a quote I ran across today… one of those observations that is so resonant with something you’ve been thinking or feeling, you almost feel a mechanical click somewhere inside your head when you first encounter it. Mr. W.H. Auden knew exactly what I’ve been struggling with as I shelve those books of mine, and mourn the loss of the specialness of books and other media:

“Again, while it is a great blessing that a man no longer has to be rich in order to enjoy the masterpieces of the past, for paperbacks, first-rate color reproductions, and stereo-phonograph records have made them available to all but the very poor, this ease of access, if misused — and we do misuse it — can become a curse. We are all of us tempted to read more books, look at more pictures, listen to more music than we can possibly absorb, and the result of such gluttony is not a cultured mind but a consuming one; what it reads, looks at, listens to is immediately forgotten, leaving no more traces behind than yesterday’s newspaper.”

Secondary Worlds (1967)

Guilty as charged. And yet, I just keep picking up more and more titles, or at least adding them to lists in the hope that I might get to them someday. Ten years ago, I basked in the pleasure of living in a time when pretty much any book or movie or TV show I could think of was — or at least soon would be — so easily available to own forever. What a ridiculous state of affairs, a true embarrassment of riches.

Spock was right. Having a thing is not so pleasing as wanting it.

Hat tip to Andrew Sullivan for sending me down this particular rabbit-hole.

spacer