Somewhat related to the previous entry (well, they both involve music, nostalgia, and grumpy old man-ism, at least), Lileks related a story today about his encounter at his local coffee house with one of those Damn Kids™ I’m always grumbling about. Here’s his comment about the young lady’s ignorance of “99 Luftballons,” the infectious ’80s classic about an accidental nuclear exchange (ah, the Cold War… those were the days!):
Kids today. No respect for kids of yesterday. Thing is, we were required to know every fargin’ thing about the 60s when we were coming up, being schooled in the ways of the Most Important Musical Genre Ever. You were required to nod at your elder and respect their sage ways, and thus I found myself in a few dorm rooms listening to peers explain why Crosby, Stills, Nash, Young, Reefer and Cocaine were incredible not just for their harmony and song-writing skills, but their ability to make music that [went] on longer than three minutes. To which you could only say: may all your girlfriends take “Love the One You’re With” to heart everytime you’re out of town.
Lileks’ real point here is, of course, less about the kids of today than his own resentment toward the ’60s — he strikes me as a man who is convinced that everything went Horribly Wrong long about 1967 and it’s only gotten worse since then; come to think of it, that’s not entirely incorrect, depending on how you look at it — but he touches on something I’ve considered myself from time to time, which is the way Boomer culture has always dominated the conversation and how people my age dealt with it, and more importantly (to me, anyhow) how that’s different from the way kids these days deal with my generation’s culture.
We who came up in the ’80s were inundated by the pop culture of our parents, the generation that came of age in the ’60s. Their music was the most obvious artifact — it was quite simply everywhere, in the advertising and the movies and television programs, and of course on the radio. And it seemed like every six months or so, the media was observing the anniversary of some watershed event or other from “that turbulent decade”: the killing of JFK, RFK, MLK, the release of Sgt. Pepper, the Summer of Love. We 80s kids had our own pop culture happening, too, but it was running neck and neck with this pervasive nostalgia for a decade most of us weren’t even alive in.
But here’s the thing: I don’t think anyone really minded. The truth is, I loved The Wonder Years and The Big Chill, and I listened to The Rolling Stones and The Doors and Janis and Jimi, and I have a lot of friends who are big Beatles fans. We respected what had come before us — for the most part, anyhow — and we even liked a lot of it.
I don’t see that happening nowadays. Granted, I don’t know any teenagers, really, but judging from what I see in popular culture and my general impression, it seems that the culture of my time doesn’t get a lot of respect, not even from the people to whom it ought to matter, i.e., my own generation. Familiar old synthpop tunes appear in movies and commercials as punchlines to show how lame someone was in high school, or perhaps still is. Everyone rolls their eyes at mullets the way people used to roll their eyes at bell-bottoms, before those came back into fashion. The movies and TV we loved is fodder for lame-ass remakes that, by their very existence, insinuate that the originals are no longer good enough for “today’s audiences.” And as for commemorating the important events of the ’80s, forget it… no one even remembers any of them, including the folks who were there. Back in the ’80s, people thought the ’60s were cool. Here in the ’00s, folks think the ’80s were silly and lame. Where’s the justice in that?
This ties into a larger idea of mine that I’ve had for several years now, which is that my generation — and presumably the gen of most of the people reading this, Generation X or whatever we’re called these days — has gotten lost in the demographic shuffle between the all-pervasive Boomers and the Millenials coming up behind us. We straddled the divide between analog and digital. We were there at the rise of, well, everything that defines our current culture: video games, the Internet, home computing, 24-hour news, the blockbuster movie… but do we get any kind of credit for it? Are we even really present in popular culture? Not so much, no, not from where I’m sitting. We had a brief moment of attention and representation in the ’90s before somebody decided the Gen Y kids were more interesting, and now we’re depicted as just the moms and dads who stand in the background while the teenage stars dominate the spotlight and read dialog that makes them out to be smarter than we are. We are the invisible gen, lost in the shadow thrown by those who came before and those who follow. The Boomers and the things they loved were revered; the things we loved are exploited, remade into shitty movies and crappy Chinese-made fashion revivals that come and go in the blink of an eye. And yes, this all bothers me, more than it should, I know, but I feel what I feel.
I admit I may be projecting my own personal feelings of inadequacy here, but… I don’t like the feeling that of being passed over before we — I — even realized it was our (my) moment. I don’t like the twentysomethings at work telling me that the original Battlestar Galactica was stupid, that “old” movies from the ’80s move too slowly or are cheesy, that it was a good day when grunge killed off hair-metal. I’d happily wear a mullet these days if it meant I could have my hair back instead of this stupid balding dome. And all you Damn Kids™ buying fake rubber dog collars at Hot Topic and thinking they look tough? We used to wear the real thing, bought from a freakin’ pet shop! And we had film directors who understood how to make a visually comprehensible action scene! And our music had actual melody instead of simply percussion and auto-tuning.
Gaaah. What does an irrelevant and graying generation have to do to get a little respect, anyhow?
It was not a good day when grunge replaced hair-metal. Grunge added absolutely nothing to the music genre, slowly evolved, and faded after Kobain’s death.
You can always listen to hair-metail with the top down in the car, and look cool.
Konstantin, I listen to my hair-metal with the top down all the time, but I have increasing doubts as to how cool I look… 🙂
Thanks, though.
OK, so part of me feels like I shouldn’t comment, because we’ve had this conversation before, but then part of me feels like if you keep bringing it up, then you must like talking about it, but then part of me knows that we disagree, and so…aw, what the heck:
I think the decrease in cultural significance from the 60s through to the 00s has to do with two (related) things: 1) a very real decrease in the competence of the contributors, and 2) a drastic lowering of the bar for who was allowed to contribute.
The 60s saw an explosion of talent, particularly in music, that you probably couldn’t find again in history unless you went back to the days of Mozart. The 70s and 80s had their Billy Joels, their Elton Johns, their Journeys, all of which were great (and are still what I consider “my” music), but most of whom were simply paying homage to the Dylans, the Joplins, the Beatles, etc., etc.. By the 90s and the 00s, though, pop culture moved from a display of professional competence to a mass-marketed “package.” Cobain, while not my cup of tea, per se, was one of very few notable exceptions. I mean, seriously – what are the odds that all of those rap artists were really that upset about so many things? As opposed to recording what they (or some record company) thought would sell well? And how many of them could actually play an instrument? Sing a song without electronic voice enhancement? WRITE a song? Professional competence quickly became optional for success, and so success did not mean as much.
Also, any damn fool with a computer can get his music up on iTunes today (or his movie or graphic novel or whatever on the web). So the talent pool is diluted and expectations are low. Just think about what it would take to pick the Beatles out as something special today, amidst all the other bands clamoring for our attention & our dollars?
When something’s special, it gets remembered and revered. When there’s too much of it, it’s not special anymore and it’s soon forgotten.
Well, Brian, for what it’s worth, this entry was really just a cri de couer from a cranky guy on the edge of a midlife crisis who was sitting up way past his bedtime.
But if you really want a serious discussion… I don’t think we disagree as much as you assume when it comes to music, except , perhaps, in certain matters of taste. I generally accept your argument that standards have fallen over the past 40 years, and especially in the last 20, as entertainment and media have become more and more packaged and commoditized. I also agree that technology has opened a floodgate of material that includes lots and lots of crap that would’ve been filtered out by The System only a decade or two ago.
But music isn’t quite what I was trying to get at with my rant. Frankly, I don’t care that current music is unmemorable crap. What bugs me is that the stuff from our formative years — which included plenty of things that were not unmemorable crap — gets so little respect from the culture at large. I’m not just talking about the music, either — I mean everything, the fashions, the hair, the movies, TV, music, the culture of the ’80s. It’s not that this stuff isn’t still out there, because 80s music and other references are everywhere. It’s the attitude so many express toward these things that riles me. We were constantly told while growing up in the 80s that everything 60s was so cool and so significant that we had to understand it and pay attention to it. Whereas the message being sent today is often “ha-ha, the 80s were lame, and all those folks who thought they were cool back then are tools.”
I don’t really know how to articulate my thinking here; I’ve tried before and I never seem to quite get my point across. But frankly I resent the way the damn Boomers have dominated the conversation for so long, how it’s been their tastes and their history that’s driven so many things, how their formative years are held up as so pivotal. And now when we’ve come of age and ought to be taking over some of the reins, the spotlight has drifted over to the kids coming up behind us. I feel like Gen X doesn’t get much credit for anything, that we’re not considered all that important, that we’re not all that cool. I feel cheated by history.
Insanely narcissistic? Perhaps. As I said in the original entry, I recognize that I may be projecting my own feelings of disappointment and/or inadequacy. And as I said above, I’m just a frustrated, soon-to-be-middle-aged guy who’s sitting at his computer when he ought to be in bed, so chances are none of this makes much sense anyhow.