Monthly Archives: June 2005

Changes in the Gallery, and New Warbird Photos

I’ve finally made good on my threat to reorganize this site’s photo gallery. If you go over there now, you’ll find that I have folded everything into three basic groupings: Random Snapshots, Travels, and Diversions. The “Random Snapshots” album remains unchanged since the last time you may have looked at it; it’s your basic grab-bag of personal subjects that most of you probably won’t care about, i.e., miscellaneous photos of myself, my girl, friends, etc. “Travels” is self-explanatory. And the “Diversions” album is where you’ll find photos of things I’d like to share, but which don’t quite fit into the other two categories, things like my warbird flight experience or some of the weird stuff I’ve been involved in or which interests me. For example, I plan to put up a sub-album showing you how my father and I once transformed a twenty-foot-long classic automobile into a rolling replica of the RMS Titanic, complete with the movie characters Jack and Rose on the “bow.” If that makes no sense to you, be patient; you will understand at some point in the (hopefully) near future…

In the meantime, check out the latest addition to the gallery, a selection of shots taken yesterday as Anne and I toured the B-17 Fuddy Duddy with her parents. (In my earlier posts, I was under the impression that the plane coming to Ogden this past weekend was the Aluminum Overcast, but I found out yesterday that the Overcast was damaged in a bad landing a year ago and is currently undergoing a complete overhaul and restoration. The Fuddy is owned by the same organization, the Experimental Aircraft Association, and has been filling the other plane’s tour obligations.)

The Fuddy Duddy is a beautiful example of this model — it includes most of the vintage equipment that a B-17 would’ve carried back in the day, including one of the legendary Norden bomb sights and a stack of radio equipment the size of your average filing cabinet. I also liked the Fuddy‘s color scheme, which consists largely of the plane’s own aluminum skin, unpainted and polished to a shiny finish. (The nose-art was disappointingly tame, however.) This plane is fitted out a bit differently than the Nine o’ Nine, the last B-17 I toured, so it’s easier for tourists to negotiate a walk-through, and I would imagine that it’s also fairly comfortable for those who choose to take a flight: unlike the B-24 I flew on, this B-17 actually has jumpseats for passengers to sit in during take-offs and landings. (I had to sit on the floor when I flew on the Dragon…)
Incidentally, touring that particular aircraft on Father’s Day had a special significance for Anne’s dad, whose own father built B-17s for Boeing during the war. I can only guess what he must’ve been feeling as he imagined his late father’s hands working the metal, installing avionics, or pounding in rivets. (Unfortunately, no one in the family is quite sure of what Anne’s grandpa actually did on the Boeing line, aside from “building B-17s.”)

spacer

Crimes Against Grammar

I earn my daily bread as a professional copy editor, among other things. That means I nitpick for cash, and just in case you’re wondering, no, there isn’t much cash to be made from picking nits. My slogan could be that immortal exchange from the Robert Redford film Sneakers:

Redford: “It’s a living.”

 

Woman: “Not a very good one.”

Anyway, doing this particular job has made me extremely sensitive to the general lack of correct grammatical usage that pervades our culture. I’m not talking about the way people speak, which is informal and colloquial by nature and thus not something I personally think is worth fretting over. I’m referring instead to the downright painful mistakes I constantly see on signs, menus, advertising, and the business documents I review — media that is professional in nature and should therefore adhere to the rules.

For some examples of the sort of thing that drives me crazy, check out this humorous collection of egregious errors that were observed along the boardwalk on Coney Island… which, as someone once pointed out, is not actually an island…

(Incidentally, the frequent misuse of the possessive apostrophe-s to make nouns plural is my greatest editorial pet peeve. It makes me say, “Arg.”)

spacer

Lileks on Sex Symbols Then and Now

James Lileks is probably one of the best known bloggers on the InterWeb. He was doing his free-form essay/daily journal thing before anyone even coined the word “blog.” His was the first blog I personally encountered, and I still read him faithfully now, years later.

To be honest, though, he often confounds me. His Daily Bleat frequently consists of nothing more than a laundry list of what he and his daughter Gnat have been doing all day — which is sometimes interesting and/or amusing, but is just as often as dull as my own life, and what’s the point of reading that? Even worse are the times when he gets political, especially if he’s pissed about some matter of foreign policy or national security. Let’s just say that his politics don’t map to my own, and words that have occured to me while reading his screeds include “reactionary,” “paranoid,” “jingoistic,” “hectoring,” and “condescending.” (Fortunately, he’s recently banished most of this content to a dedicated Screedblog, so I no longer have to avoid the Bleat for fear of wanting to put a fist through my monitor.)

I keep reading him because I admire his writing, his ability to work in the medium of words. He has a knack for precisely capturing things that are difficult to convey, concepts and aesthetics and, for lack of a better term, the vibe of a particular time or place. It’s a skill I’m trying to develop and, although I think I’m getting better at that whole “essence of an era” thing, I envy the talent of a guy like Lileks. Take, for example, this little tidbit from today’s Bleat:

Last night on “What’s My Line,” the guest was… Mamie Van Doren, a breathy va-va-va-voomer who performed the odd facial alphabet of the 50s sex siren – the moue, the wink, the coquettish smile, the wide eyes, the teasing glance. And she ran through the sequence again and again, a performance completely disconnected from the questions. It was like watching a prototype Sexbot stuck in an programming loop. She really was from another era – a time when the sex stars had hips like oven doors, hair the color of astronaut suits, brains the size of ant thoraxes, and a life of giddy leisure that revolved around small, portable dogs, beefy Pepsodent morons, pink convertibles, and the purchase of ceramic cat statuary with long necks. A bratwurst to Paris Hilton’s Slim Jim.

That’s brilliant work. Simply brilliant. If you’ve ever seen old footage of a 1950s sexpot, you know his description is dead on, and if you haven’t, well, it’s easy enough to imagine what he’s getting at, isn’t it? I especially love the final line about Paris Hilton, that bony little stick-figure who has elevated vacuous sluttishness to an art form. In one short, smart-assy sentence — a sentence fragment, no less — Lileks wonderfully contrasts the ideals of the post-WW II culture with our own, makes it funny, and even gives us some nifty subtext in the references to meat. (Read into that whatever you will about phony airbrushed sexuality, base desires, models, and advertising. I find it an especially interesting metaphor given the current grumbling about Paris’ TV spot for the Carl’s Jr hamburger chain. Discuss amongst yourselves.)

I stand in professional awe. You only get that sort of quality subtext from a fine wordsmith. Lileks is a writer, by God! If only he weren’t so frequently confounding…

spacer

Lane Smith

Well, now, this sucks — I just learned that one of my favorite character actors, Lane Smith, has died.

He’s one of those guys whose name you probably don’t recognize, but you’d know his face instantly; he did a lot of movies in the ’70s and ’80s that qualify as minor classics, including Rooster Cogburn, Network, Prince of the City, Frances, Places in the Heart, and one of the most incredibly jingoistic and far-fetched (yet entertaining) movies to emerge from the Reagan Era, Red Dawn. More recently, he’s appeared in lighter fare such as My Cousin Vinny, The Mighty Ducks, and Son-in-Law, which has the dubious distinction of being the only Pauly Shore movie that is remotely watchable.

Fans of genre TV will remember Smith as Nathan Bates, the power-hungry industrialist who collaborated with the alien Visitors in V: The Series, as well as the Elvis-obsessed editor Perry White in Lois and Clark: The New Adventures of Superman. Also, all the obituaries I’ve scanned note that Smith played Nixon in a TV miniseries called The Final Days, which I’m sorry to say I’ve never seen. (Personally, I tend to picture him in the opening credits of V, parked behind a big desk with an oily smile, an ugly suit, and a cigar the size of a car muffler.)

The best obituary I’ve found indicates that he died from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, better known as Lou Gehrig’s Disease. I mention this little factoid only because I’ve had some personal experience with ALS, and my ears tend to prick up when I hear of someone being afflicted with it. Trust me, it’s not a pretty way to go, and it breaks my heart that this talented man had to face such a miserable end.

For the record, he was 69 years old, only a few years older than my parents and way too damn young for this…

spacer

Pink Floyd’s Set List

For any Floyd fans who may be lurking among my three loyal readers, my friend Robert sends word that speculation about the band’s Live 8 set list has begun! (Of course it has; this is the Internet, after all…)

If you’d like to join in the fun or just see what other people are hoping to hear, check out the discussion thread at the Pink Floyd forum.

For whatever it’s worth, Robert would like to see the band “do some real esoteric shit like [his] personal favorite, ‘Several Species of Small Furry Animals Gathered Together in a Cave and Grooving with a Pict.'”

Hmm. I can’t say I’m familiar with that one…

spacer

Speaking of Airplanes…

I caught a few seconds of video on the news last night of a B-17 being welcomed to Ogden. “Odd,” I thought, “the Aluminum Overcast isn’t supposed to be here until the weekend.” I figured I must’ve misinterpreted what I was seeing and paid it no further mind.

This morning, however, I got an e-mail from my fellow warbird enthusiast Dave. Apparently, the bird on the news last night is a different B-17 called the Sentimental Journey. A little googling reveals that this B-17, which is supposed to be the most fully restored example around, is owned and operated by the Arizona Wing of the Confederate Air Force, a nation-wide volunteer group dedicated to preserving old planes in their flyable condition. It’s on display right now at the Ogden-Hinckley Airport and will be open to the public, 9:00 AM to 8 PM, through Thursday. The plane will depart on Friday morning, the same day the EAA‘s B-17, Aluminum Overcast, arrives. As Dave said in his message to me, “This could be a terrific opportunity to see not one, but two B-17s within the same week!”

(If the timing works out right, they might both be on the ground at the same time, a spectacle rarely seen since the ’40s.)

The CAF requests a $5.00 donation to tour the Sentimental Journey, and flight opportunities are available. Once again, I can’t stress how amazing that experience is; if you have the extra cash, by all means, take a ride aboard one of these historic planes. You won’t regret it.

You can learn more about the Sentimental Journey here, and don’t forget that the Aluminum Overcast will be at the same airport this weekend.

spacer

Low-Flying Planes and 21st Century Angst

I don’t usually suffer from the post-9/11 jumpiness that afflicts so many Americans. I don’t freak out whenever Homeland Security spins the Big Color Wheel, I don’t compulsively imagine horrific scenarios of doom a la James Lileks, and, aside from the hour a week when I’m watching 24, I don’t fret about sleeper cells executing their nefarious plans within our borders. Generally, I’m more worried about other people’s road-rage than I am about swarthy militants setting off a dirty bomb in the quiet little backwater I call home. It’s not that I think another attack is impossible or even unlikely; I just don’t see the usefulness of living in a state of constant anxiety, and I also don’t think Salt Lake City is much of a target compared to other places around the country. We’re a smallish city, we don’t command much national attention, and we don’t have any globally recognizable landmarks whose loss would demoralize the entire country. (Well, I guess the main LDS Temple is pretty well known, but it’s not the same kind of high-profile target as, say, the Empire State Building or the Golden Gate.) Yep, I feel pretty safe living here in dull ol’ Deseret.

And that’s why my reaction to the incident this morning was so… unexpected. What incident, you ask? Well, kids, let me tell you a story…

spacer

Good, Bad… I’m the One With the Gun

As I wrote a week or so back, I’ve been fairly puzzled by some people’s reaction to the revelation of Deep Throat’s identity. Here in my home state of Utah, especially, a lot of folks are saying that Mark Felt is a bum because he betrayed a president he was sworn to protect. I wonder what those same people think about Nixon himself. Do they think he was wrongfully driven from office for the crimes committed in his name, if not on his actual orders? Do they honestly believe Felt’s “betrayal” is worse than breaking and entering, illegal wiretapping, and government cover-ups, all for the purpose of one political party unfairly increasing and retaining its grip on power? It seems to me that Felt was being a good soldier by protecting the Republic as opposed to a president he knew to be corrupt. In other words, he was showing loyalty to something higher and more important than Richard Nixon. Just in case you missed it the first time I said it, I’ll say it again: it doesn’t really matter what motivated him to do it, because it was ultimately the right thing to do, for the country as a whole. In the real world, people often do things that get labelled as “good” or “bad” regardless of the purity of their intentions, and that’s how I see Mark Felt blowing the whistle.

Mark Evanier has a similar take on this subject, which I think is as good a defense of Felt as anything further that I could say:

People have been debating whether Mark “Deep Throat” Felt was a good guy or a bad guy, and these debates often seem to be conducted on the assumption that he had to have been one or the other.

 

I don’t think many public figures — especially in government — can be fit wholly into one of those two classifications, and I see no reason to expect that Mr. Felt can be so tidily rated. His motives in leaking to Bob Woodward were probably some mixture of wanting to protect the F.B.I. from abuse by the Nixon administration and wanting to advance his personal agenda. In the grand scheme of things, I suspect he was less important to the toppling of a president than he was to the career advancement of Woodward and Bernstein. I don’t think what he did was dishonorable or illegal — that’s the spin of those who cast their lot with Richard M. Nixon — and to the extent he did it to expose corruption, I guess he’s a hero. But only for that one series of actions. He wasn’t a hero for what he did soon after.

Evanier finishes with a link to an article that details Felt’s less-than-noble, post-Throat exploits, if you’re interested.

spacer

When Fanboys Go Bad

From the Department of Amusingly Daft Things That Total Fanboys Do on Larks (DADTTTFDL) comes a report that someone has stolen a Dalek from a British tourist attraction and is holding it for ransom. Daleks, in case you’re not geeky enough to know, are the arch-enemies of the cult TV hero Doctor Who. A race of cyborg mutants encased in rolling shells that vaguely resemble giant fire hydrants, the Daleks are basically stock sci-fi villains in that they’re always trying to take over the universe and kill any life-form they deem inferior to themselves (that would be all of them). (The Wikipedia has an insanely detailed entry on Daleks that includes photos, history, and social commentary on the “Dalek phenomenon,” if you’re interested.)

According to the news story, the missing Dalek is supposed to be an original prop from the BBC series and could be worth thousands of pounds. The “kidnappers” removed one of the prop’s “arms” and left it on a doorstep with a ransom note that says they are “awaiting further instructions from the Doctor.” Hopefully they’re just kidding and don’t really expect to be contacted by a time-travelling goofball… although that may happen, too, since the news story linked above notes that:

Former Dr. Who actor Colin Baker has been in touch with staff at the attraction, and may be asked to send a message to the kidnappers.

Could this all be an elaborate ruse cooked up just to meet a celebrity? Hard telling… I’ll keep you posted with any follow-up news on this critical situation.

(Incidentally, I used to be a pretty major Who fan back in high school, and I actually met Colin Baker at a “meet-and-greet” autograph session way back in the glorious ’80s. Charming fellow, very tall…)

spacer

Beelzebub Must Be Reaching for a Sweater…

Well, this is just amazing: Pink Floyd is getting back together for a one-night-only performance at Bob Geldof’s upcoming Live 8 concert. For the record, I don’t especially like Floyd — I mostly find their work pretentious and depressing — but the conflict between the band’s bass player Roger Waters and guitarist David Gilmour is legendary among rock-music afficianados, and for fans of the band, this news must seem like nothing short of a miracle. As I recall, Geldof pulled off a similarly unlikely reunion of Led Zeppelin for his ’85 LiveAid concerts. If he can perform impossible stunts like getting these notoriously acrimonious musicians back together, why hasn’t this man taken over the world by now? Maybe that’s the next item on his agenda…

spacer