Tsunami

Hi, kids. Hope everyone had a good Christmas. Mine was pleasant, if pretty unremarkable overall.

I’ve been thinking this morning about the tragedy that hit Southeast Asia over the holiday weekend, the massive, earthquake-generated waves that battered so many countries and claimed so many lives. I know everyone is talking about this, and there really isn’t much to say in the wake of such death and destruction that hasn’t been said already. Nevertheless, I can’t help but think I’ve got to say something. This event is too big to let it pass without some sort of acknowledgement.

Last I heard the official death toll had risen above 70,000 — that’s the population of my hometown of Riverton and several neighboring towns combined. In other words, if I lived on the Indian Ocean, every face I see during my day, every other driver I pass during my daily errands, every person who works out at my gym and uses my library and shops at my grocery store and drinks coffee at Beans ‘n’ Brews and rents videos at the corner Hollybuster — all of these people would be gone. Washed out of this world and into the next in a matter of minutes. I find myself imagining my familiar environment emptied of all those people whose names I don’t even know, whom I’ve so often cursed when I’ve been frustrated with traffic or crowds or just with the idea that my quiet rural home has morphed into a suburb. I’ve seen enough Twilight Zones and end-of-the-world movies that it’s fairly easy to picture the buildings deserted and the roads silent, but it’s a profoundly unsettling picture.

Think about the numbers for a moment. Seventy thousand people dead, and even more missing, possibly never to be found. People like you and me, filled with dreams and ambitions, strengths and weaknesses, hobbies and interests. Lifetimes of memory, triumph, pain, and, if they were lucky, love. Human beings. Just… gone. As if they never existed.

Americans aren’t accustomed to thinking about death in such large-scale terms. Even 9/11, the most devastating thing to happen on our soil for the better part of a century, was insignificant compared to what’s happened on the other side of the world. I don’t mean to minimize the horrors of 9/11 or demean the individual lives lost in the terror attacks, but in purely objective terms, 3000 people and two buildings are a mere drop in the bucket compared to what people in Thailand, India, Sri Lanka, and a hundred other places with exotic-sounding names are now facing. I’ve heard that one island nation — Sumatra, I think — was actually moved 100 feet to the west by this event, and that many inhabited islands haven’t been heard from since the tsunami struck them. No one knows if the radio gear on those islands was destroyed, or if there just isn’t anyone left alive to answer.

One particular video clip keeps running through my mind as I think about all this. I’m sure everyone out there has seen it if you watch television at all: recorded from some place high up, maybe a hotel balcony, the clip begins with a mundane beach view that’s partly obscured by palm trees and more modest buildings. But then the sea rises up and flows inland, just as abruptly and inevitably as if a bubble has popped.

There are two aspects of this video that are truly startling. One is the inexorable quality of the water’s progress. There’s simply nothing that will stop it. It’s almost nonchalant, like Poseidon shrugging, horrifying in its casual dismissal of anything related to humanity.

The other thing that really penetrates in this clip is the height of the wave. It’s even with the rooftops. The churning surface of the water runs just beneath the tops of the palms. The image is strikingly similar to the big moment from last summer’s film The Day After Tomorrow, when a massive wave strikes New York City and pours through the ordered grid of city streets, filling every opening of the most familiar skyline in the world. A few months ago, this image was the height of escapist entertainment: spectacular and frightening, but safely in the realm of the imaginary. Now, however, it’s become awesomely real… and maybe that’s why we’re paying so much attention to it, because the imagery of that film is still fresh in our minds.

I know that’s a cynical idea, that we’re only watching this story because it looks like a recent movie. But let’s be honest — disasters strike the Third World with some regularity and most Americans rarely notice. It’s not that we don’t care, I don’t think, but we have little reason to pay attention. There’s no “hook” into the story, nothing familiar to us, no stakes or consequences for us. How many thousands have died in earthquakes in Eastern Europe, India and South America in recent years? How many of famine in Africa? And yet we don’t see them, generally speaking. So why do we see this one?

Another cynical answer is that some of the places that were hit hardest are big tourist stops, and that there are so many American, European, and Australian tourists among the dead and missing. Would we care as much about this particular disaster if we hadn’t heard about the little blond boy whose photo was seen by his grandfather in Sweden? Or the Sports Illustrated swimsuit model who saved herself by clinging to a tree, only to lose her boyfriend in the deluge? Or the fifteen-year-old Utah girl who was vacationing in Indonesia with her father and his girlfriend and is now among the missing? Maybe we would, I don’t know. I tend to underestimate people’s nobility sometimes, and, in any event, I’m just musing to myself for lack of anything better to say…

spacer

6 comments on “Tsunami

  1. Dave W.

    Some of the things you posted here are the exact things I was thinking about today. I hadn’t paid much attention to the tsunami, because I don’t watch the news an sometimes I don’t know what’s going on. But when I read an article today that said the death toll had risen to 120,000, my first thought was that it must be some kind of mistake. Not to be a numbers freak, but I compared that to the 3,000 from the 9/11 attack and I was just astounded.
    True, 9/11 occured mostly in the center of commerce in the middle of New York City…and if we personally did not know any victims, it is certainly close to home. Most of the victims of the tsunami were poor people literally on the other side of the world.
    On the other side, perhaps we don’t grasp the scope of the disaster because it doesn’t have a good name. An article today was comparing some past disasters, and I was surprised that the explosion on Krakatoa–which I had heard of even though it took place in 1883–had about 36,400 fatalities. I think that it will take some time before the scope if the tsunami will really sink in.
    For what it’s worth…

  2. Jason

    That’s a good point about naming disasters. This thing just keeps getting bigger, and it’s tough to wrap one’s mind around it without a convenient way to label it.
    Krakatoa, 9/11, Pompeii — I hate to sound crass, but these are good, marketable names. They’re concrete. “Southeastern Asia tsunami” doesn’t really resonate, partly because of the awkwardness of phrase, but also, perhaps, because the scope of it is too large. The tsunami hit a lot of different countries, whereas those other disasters were more confined to a single location. (Well, the effects of Krakatoa weren’t, but there was a distinct source for that one — the island of Krakatoa itself.)

  3. Mike Chenoweth

    I think Tsunami resonates rather well with me. I have a plug-in for my video editing software called Tsunami. Just doesn’t ring the same with me anymore as trivial as it may be.
    120,000 people. It’s so hard to gauge that number as nothing has come close to wiping out that many people at one time unless you go back I’m guessing to the middle ages and black plague. I’m sure the numbers will continue to climb fairly rapidly however I’m not sure that anyone can really fathom the maginitude of what occured as we have nothing to compare it against. As good of a time for a small donation to the Red Cross as any right now. After such a commercialized Christmas, it’s the least we that are fairly comfortable (in 3rd world eyes) can do.

  4. Jason

    Absolutely. I’ve never donated to an organized charity before, but I’ve given to the Red Cross for this thing. I’m certain the death toll will reach a quarter million fairly soon, and I wouldn’t be surprised to see it go to half a mil, and that’s just the cost in life. Wait until the dollar figures for rebuilding all that was destroyed start coming back.
    I think you might be right, Mike, about nothing this big since the Middle Ages. If we’re just talking natural disasters (as opposed to wars or man-made disasters like the Bhopal gas leaks in India back in the 80s) I can’t think of one that’s been so large in recent memory. Even the 1906 San Francisco quake or Krakatoa itself didn’t approach this one. Of course, one thing to keep in mind is that populations are larger now than they used to be. More potential victims available…

  5. Dave W.

    As far as numbers go, we need to keep things in perspective here. Looking back at other tsunamis that have happened in the past, none of them even come close to the numbers that this one has, at least not from what I’ve seen. But if you are going to add microbes to the equation, there have been many plagues since the Black Death of the middle ages. The Influenza Pandemic of 1918-1919 alone killed between 20-40 million people, and yet most people don’t know much about events like that, myself included. http://www.stanford.edu/group/virus/uda/

  6. Jason

    I’m planning to do a little googling for some numbers on previous disasters for a follow-up post, just haven’t managed to do it yet. It’s kind of restrictive to be at home with only sloooooowwww dial-up access, you know. 🙂