Scalzi’s Canon of Science Fiction Films

John Scalzi of Whatever fame has just added another title to his growing list of published works, a non-fiction volume called The Rough Guide to Sci-Fi Movies. I haven’t seen the book yet, but it sounds like a pretty thorough overview of the genre, including information on the origins and history of science fiction movies as well as lots of other stuff that fans should find interesting. However, as Scazi himself noted the other day, the part of the book that people will find most interesting is The Canon:

…the 50 science fiction films [he] deemed to be the most significant in the history of film. Note that “most significant” does not mean “best” or “most popular” or even “most influential.” Some of the films may be all three of these, but not all of them are — indeed, some films in The Canon aren’t objectively very good, weren’t blockbusters and may not have influenced other filmmakers to any significant degree. Be that as it may, [Scalzi] think[s] they matter — in one way or another, they are uniquely representative of some aspect of the science fiction film experience.

John helpfully listed said Canon in the entry I’ve quoted. Not surprisingly, given the way the blogosphere feeds on its own young, some ambitious blogger immediately transformed the list into one of those memes where you bold the titles you’ve seen. Not being one to miss out on a good meme, let’s take a look at how of these movies I can cross off the list:


The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension!
Akira
Alien
Aliens

Alphaville
Back to the Future
Blade Runner
Brazil

Bride of Frankenstein
Brother From Another Planet
A Clockwork Orange
Close Encounters of the Third Kind
Contact

The Damned
Destination Moon
The Day The Earth Stood Still

Delicatessen
Escape From New York
ET: The Extraterrestrial
Flash Gordon: Space Soldiers
(serial)
The Fly (1985 version)
Forbidden Planet
Ghost in the Shell
Gojira/Godzilla
The Incredibles
Invasion of the Body Snatchers
(1956 version)
Jurassic Park
Mad Max 2/The Road Warrior
The Matrix
Metropolis
On the Beach
Planet of the Apes
(1968 version)
Robocop
Sleeper
Solaris
(1972 version)
Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope
Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back

The Stepford Wives
Superman
Terminator 2: Judgement Day
The Thing From Another World

Things to Come
Tron
12 Monkeys

28 Days Later
20,000 Leagues Under the Sea
2001: A Space Odyssey
La Voyage Dans la Lune
War of the Worlds
(1953 version)

I guess these results are no surprise to anyone who’s been hanging around this site for a while. And it probably also wouldn’t surprise any of you to learn that many of these same titles appear on my personal list of all-time favorite movies.
Of the small handful of titles on this list that I haven’t seen, several (Bride of Frankenstein, Gojira/Godzilla, 28 Days Later, and Things to Come) are ones I’d like to see. (I actually own a copy of Bride, but I’ve never gotten around to watching it.) At least one of them — The Stepford Wives — is something I think I saw a long time ago, but don’t really remember. Oddly, given my vast mental storehouse of useless trivia, there are a couple movies here I’ve never heard of: The Damned, Alphaville, and Delicatessen. And I must admit that although I know about Solaris, I have zero interest in seeing either film version of that story. Blame a really bad lit-class experience with the original novel, which bored me into a mushy grey stupor.

Finally, I would be neither a blogger nor a science-fiction fan if I didn’t indulge in a little griping about some of these titles. Although they may indeed be significant or representative of some aspect of the genre as Scalzi asserts, I’ve never understood the fuss made over Akira, Ghost in the Shell, or Brazil. The first two left me cold because they’re anime — that’s Japanese animation, for the uninitiated — and I don’t care much for that stuff. That always seems to surprise people when the subject comes up, as if my interest in science fiction and comics naturally means that I also love “Japanimation” with the heat of a thousand suns. Sorry, not the case.

I’ve tried to like anime. I really have. But I don’t. I really don’t. Every frame of anime I’ve ever seen (with the exception of a couple of TV series I remember fondly from childhood) has left me with a vaguely baffled sensation similar to the one you experience when you’re really hung over, or if you haven’t slept well for several nights. At the risk of sounding ignorant or culturally intolerant, I think anime is weird. Partly it’s the way the characters are drawn with huge eyes and bushy shocks of physics-defying hair; partly it’s the peculiar visual conventions that suggest movement when nothing in the frame is actually, you know, moving. But mostly it’s because, on some deep, fundamental, ineffable level, I just don’t get it.

And then there’s Brazil, a movie of which, again, people always seem to assume I’d be a big fan. Well, I know I’ve seen it, I know I found it agreeable enough, but it absolutely failed to make any kind of impact on my psyche. I sort of remember that it was kind of like 1984 fed through a Monty-Pythonizer, but I couldn’t tell you who the characters were, what they did, where they did it, what they were wearing when they did it, or anything else about this film. It is as if the movie washed across my forehead like water and just kept right on going, leaving no mark whatsoever on the obstacle it encountered during its journey elsewhere. No impression at all.

Come to think of it, Contact was the exact same way. I saw it, liked it well enough, don’t remember a damn thing about it, and am frankly amazed that Scalzi thought enough of it to put it on his list. I guess the cliche is true and there is no accounting for taste…

spacer

6 comments on “Scalzi’s Canon of Science Fiction Films

  1. anne

    I know you’ve seen a lot of movies, but it still suprises me when I see a list like this. There are several items on it that I’ve never even heard of. 🙂

  2. jason

    There were a couple there I hadn’t heard of either, hon. 🙂 But I can’t deny that I’ve spent a heckuva lot of my life in front of a glowing screen of one sort or another…

  3. Jen B.

    Ask Steve about Delicatessen. It’s a French film. He borrowed it from the library once.
    I like anime for the art of it. Good anime (and I must make that distinction) has a real care for detail, anatomy, storytelling and sheer beauty of design that puts American animation to shame. Still, some people will just never like it or “get” it, and that’s okay. I would argue that some of the techniques and themes in Akira are what make it influential and important… but then, I’ve not seen it so I can’t really say. (And Steve and I still think you’d like Cowboy Bebop…)

  4. jason

    Hey Jen, I knew you or Steve would respond to the bit about anime. 😉
    I accept your argument about the artistic quality of anime — in the films I’ve seen, I can see that the level of craftsmanship is high, and I respect that. I think the problem for me is more a matter of style. I don’t respond to the look of the films, at least not the ones I’ve seen. And Akira is pretty weird in the story department, too… 🙂

  5. Keith

    Hi Jas,
    Keep up the blogging when you can, I find it fun to read when I get a chance.
    As far as movies go, I would say that Delicatessen should go to the top of your list. I would insist on that except that you didn’t like Brazil so much. Delicatessen is not so political or abstract as Brazil, but I think it notches up the funky and what-sa while still remaining mostly approachable. One of the directors/co-writers also directed/co-wrote Amelie. So if YOU liked Amelie then YOU would most likely like Delicatessen–other people might be more put off by its black comical nature. If you haven’t see Amelie…TO THE TOP OF YOUR LIST IT GOES!!
    As far as the other films go, the only other film I have seen that you haven’t is the original Solaris. “Seen” might not be accurate as slept through most of it at IC. It’s all kind of a blur, I think I was really tired and it moved at a 2001 pace while being much more boring.
    I’m a little bit reserved when it comes to these kinds of lists. I think that the impact of most things in life is very time/situation dependent. Don’t get me wrong, some works are so much better than others and have lasting and universal power, but most of their influence is timing dependent. The most influential movie in my life is Koyaanisqatsi: Life out of Balance. The month I saw it, my life was out of balance and the movie crushed me. Now I watch it and I still love it, but all I get is a firm push. It’s still a great movie and so much more than the other two movies in the trilogy. But my life’s situation made it earth moving for me when I first saw it. I imagine it is the same with anime–some people are ready for it and “get it” and the rest of us don’t “need” or “want” to get it–at least at the time we see it. I guess what makes a work really good and universal it that it applies and connects to a large number of people over a long period of time.
    Well, this comment is turning into an entry and this is your blog and I must be back to work…hasta…

  6. jason

    Hey Keith, good to hear from you!
    Just to clarify, I didn’t dislike Brazil. As best as I can remember, I liked it fine. But it hasn’t stayed with me, and I haven’t really had much desire to see it again, if that makes sense. It just… failed to make an impression. Pretty much all of Terry Gilliam’s movies have been the same way for me. Fine at the time, but ultimately not very memorable.
    You make a very good point about “right time, right place” for our first exposure to things and what kind of impact they have on us. I find that current films, regardless of how much I may like them, mostly fail to generate the intense loyalty I feel for the ones I saw when I was younger. For example, I don’t have any where near the affection for The Lord of the Rings, as fantastic as it was, as I do for the original Star Wars trilogy. More recent examples seem to follow this pattern, too — I liked the recent Batman Begins very much, but I prefer the 1989 Batman movie, as campy and riddled with plot holes as it is. Because it’s all tied up with the time of my life when I first saw it, and that time was a precious thing to me and it’s long gone.
    You’ve made this point before, of course, and I’ve had thoughts of doing a longer entry about it… but we all know how that goes. 🙂