March 2011 Archives
For now, until Jack and/or I can figure this out, I've decided to disable the Google and Yahoo registration options altogether. This means a few of you may no longer be able to sign in; again, my apologies. If you have a problem, just go ahead and create an account here on my host server. In fact, I strongly urge all of my Loyal Readers to do that, since that option seems to be the one that's working best. It's quick and painless and asks for no more information than the commenting feature on the old platform did. I believe you'll get a confirmation email after you register; don't forget to follow the instructions it contains. Once I get all the regulars set up and "trusted," I hope we won't have to talk about this anymore. And I also hope all the hassle hasn't put anyone off...
If you don't obsessively follow useless trivia the way I do, you probably don't realize that Captain Kirk and Mr. Spock -- er, I mean, William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy -- both have birthdays this week, and they're both achieving the same landmark age of 80 years old. Today is Bill's day, with Leonard catching up to him this Saturday.
Hard to imagine my boyhood heroes becoming genuinely old, especially Shatner, who, despite his generally goofy latter-day persona, remains almost shockingly vital. In other words, he really doesn't seem like an 80-year-old. (By contrast, Nimoy appeared rather frail in the Star Trek reboot movie a couple years ago, but perhaps he was just going through a rough patch while they were filming that.) Harder still to contemplate: if these guys are getting old, what does that say about me? I think I'm now about the age Kirk was supposed to be in Star Trek: The Motion Picture, and that's just... weird...
Although we make much of our tradition of freedom in this country, we are not so clever at understanding what freedom really means. Even our president, for example, cannot understand that among the rights symbolized by the American flag is the right to burn it - or honor it, if that is our choice. I have always wondered why the people who call themselves "American" most loudly are often the ones with the least understanding of the freedoms that word should represent.
When the country is threatened, our civil liberties are among the first casualties - as if we can fight the enemy by taking away our own freedoms before the enemy has a chance to. That is what happened in the early days of World War II, when a wave of racism swept the Japanese-Americans out of their homes and businesses, confiscated their savings and investments, and shipped them away in prison trains to concentration camps that were sometimes no more than barns and stables. Later on some of these same Japanese-Americans fought with valor in the same war, perhaps because they understood better than their captors what they were fighting for.The review is dated 1991, so the president he's referring to would have been George H.W. Bush. And indeed, I do recall that flag burning was quite a hot-button issue back then. Simpler times, I guess. For the record, my position has always been the same as Ebert's. I don't approve of burning flags -- I think it's stupid and does nothing but piss people off -- but cries to outlaw the practice rub me the wrong way. Naturally the senior senator from my state, Orrin Hatch, seems to propose a Constitutional amendment to prohibit it almost every year. I really dislike that man -- one of these days, I'll tell the story of the time I met him in person and he demonstrated such an utter dickishness that I've never gotten over it. And this was even before I started having much in the way of political opinions!
One final thought: I never saw Come See the Paradise, but it sounds good. The Japanese-American internment camps are an interest of mine; one of them was right here in Utah, only about two hours' drive from my home, out in some of the most desolate territory in the whole damn country. And one of these days, I might write about that, too...
Moments ago, while walking through the section that encompasses my father's junkyard, The Girlfriend suddenly halted, took a couple of steps backward, and then asked, "Is that a flamethrower over there?"
I took a look at the object in question and confirmed that, yes, it is indeed a flamethrower. Well, of a sort. It doesn't actually project a stream of burning gasoline -- which would be way-cool, by the way -- but it is a long wand-like gadget designed to produce flame at the tip. Dad cobbled it together a number of years ago when he needed to thaw something out in the dead of winter. I forget what.
Anne shook her head and said, "You know, when your parents die, we'll have to figure out what to do with all this shit."
I replied, "Yes, and then the flamethrower will be ours."
But hey, I care -- I really care -- about you crazy kids waiting around out there in the early-spring twilight for me to entertain you, so how about my usual fallback for times when I don't have much time to write something that actually means anything: yes, it's a music video!
(The truth is, I've been missing my Friday Evening Videos feature anyway. I went through a phase in my early teens when I wanted to be a DJ -- that would be the radio variety, not the modern-day guys who scratch records in dance clubs -- and these entries let me play at that role a little.)
Tonight's selection doesn't have any story behind it -- I just saw it for the first time myself a couple days ago -- but I've always liked The Bangles, the all-girl group that's best-known for their number-one hit "Walk Like an Egyptian" (although I prefer the number-two-charting "Manic Monday" myself) as well as the shortness of lead singer Susanna Hoffs' skirts. There's no question that all four members of the band were easy on the eyes, but they were also very tight musically and they crafted quite a few great, hooky pop singles during the mid to late '80s, probably more than most people realize. This particular song, "Going Down to Liverpool," is a bit obscure (it didn't even chart in the U.S., although it appears on their 1990 Greatest Hits compilation), but it's a nice little tune and one of the rare occasions when drummer Debbi Peterson took over the lead vocals.
However, the real reason I decided to post this one here is... well, I'll let you be surprised by who guest-stars in the video. I'll just say that he looks very Mission: Impossible-ish here, and it's my understanding he agreed to do this because his son was a friend of Susanna's... and any friend of Susanna's is a friend of... well, just take a look:
[Okay, I can't refrain from making one comment: the background music is both overly saccharine and mixed a little too loudly, causing it to compete with Takei's voiceover in a couple of places. And nothing irritates me more than competing audio tracks or songs, which is a big part of why I don't enjoy many musicals -- I can't handle the thing where two people sing different songs simultaneously. But hey, this video still carries a good message...]
As an additional note/caveat, you must have a profile defined for the Google and Yahoo authentication to work.If any Loyal Readers who've already checked in have any discomfort about using their Google or other accounts, feel free to set up a new, local one. On the plus side, doing that will let you choose a new username, if you're not wild about the one you've got. This may be especially handy if the one you have is just a big long string of code. I'll even delete the previous comments made under another identity, if you wish. Just let me know. (I'm probably overthinking this/making too damn big a deal about it, as I usually do. Feel free to let me know that, too, if you must.)
You may also setup a local blog account with standard email authentication. There's a "Sign-up" linky-dink in the bottom right corner of the the credentials window.
Anyhow, I promise this will be the last word on commenting for a while, unless something comes to my attention that's not working. Do as you please, Loyal Readers, and I'll quit trying to direct you. The next entry will be back to the usual drivel...
Now then, it appears that the new commenting system has a few bugs, as a number of you have mentioned problems with signing in, especially those who tried to use your Google and/or Yahoo! credentials. Webmaster Jack has done some work tonight and reports that the registration system ought to be working now as far as signing in goes, although he still doesn't know why some people's usernames are appearing as big long URL/code strings. I am, of course, completely clueless about all of it and will take his word for it.
In any event, one of the cooler things about this new platform is that allows me to "trust" regular commenters so your remarks no longer have to be held in moderation, i.e., you should be able to make a comment and have it immediately appear. At this time, the following regulars have been so approved:
- Puffbird
- Jaquandor
- Burlaki.com
- Ilyuha
- CrankyRobert
- KonstantinB
(Brian, I figured there wasn't much sense "trusting" you until we can get the username issue resolved. Nothing personal... )
So, you folks in the list above, please do my a favor by signing in and saying something, then letting me know if anything happens that looks like it shouldn't happen. Thanks for your support, and hopefully we'll have this all running smoothly in the next few days...
I don't have much more to say than I've already said many times -- I think the space shuttles are magnificent machines that once represented all my dreams for the future, and I'm genuinely sad to see their era coming to an end. Especially as I have my days when I think this just may be the proverbial it for manned spaceflight by Americans. Oh, sure, we'll keep hitching rides to the ISS on Russian ships for a few more years, and companies like SpaceX are promising some exciting things, but I can't help feeling like the day of the Space Transportation System -- that'd be the shuttle to you and me -- isn't the only one that's passing. The Space Age that began in the 1950s and always seemed like such a given as I was growing up, such a well-loved and everlasting institution, seems to be winding down, too. There are partisan types who are quick to blame the situation on President Obama because he's the one who axed the Constellation program that was supposed to replace the shuttle, but it wasn't his fault. It's been coming for years. Decades, maybe. We are diminishing, as a culture. We lost our nerve somewhere along the way, and our drive and our curiosity went with it. The human race will spread out into the system one of these days, but I no longer have faith that Americans will be leading the way.
But this also is something I've said before. For today, let's just focus on Discovery and her incredible legacy. She is the most-traveled of the shuttle fleet, clocking up a whopping 365 days in space over 39 missions across a 27-year operational lifespan. She's circled the Earth 5,830 times for a grand total of 148, 221, 675 miles traversed while in orbit. And as Commander Steve Lindsay noted in his remarks on the Kennedy Space Center runway this afternoon, with his ship standing proudly on the tarmac behind him, she came home today as perfect as on her very first flight.
Discovery's next journey will be a comparative hop of only 750 miles, from Kennedy to Washington, DC, where she will become a permanent resident of the Smithsonian alongside her sister ship, the prototype Enterprise. My understanding is that the two spaceplanes will be parked nose to nose, representing the beginning and the end of the program. One day, I intend to stand in front of that exhibit. And I'm willing to bet my eyes will fill with tears for what was, and what I always thought would be...
But the thing I imagine my Loyal Readers will be most interested in and excited by is the return of... commenting! Yes, once again we can make this place a virtual salon of witticisms and fascinating back-and-forth... with one difference from before: you've now got to register in order to prove yourself real enough to talk to me, and not a worthless golmonging spambot. I'll be honest, I'm not entirely sure of how this registration process is supposed to work, although the system apparently accepts logins from a variety of blogging platforms and web portals. So if you've got a Google or a Yahoo or a LiveJournal identity, those things all ought to work here to get you into the commenting queue. Anyhow, give it a try and if you have problems, shoot me an email at jason at jasonbennion.com, and I'll see if I can figure out what's wrong. I hope this won't prove to be an inconvenience for anyone, but I'm practically bouncing in my office chair for the joy of not having to deal with any more bloody spam...
Well, that was a fast mission... STS-133 is already winding down, just as I was getting used to the idea. Discovery undocked from the International Space Station early this morning and is now pulling away a little more with each orbit, heading for a planned Wednesday landing at Kennedy Space Center in Florida. It leaves behind a completed ISS, the largest object mankind has ever put up there in the black. It's not exactly the elegant wheel-shaped space station of Stanley Kubrick's 2001, but it is nonetheless an incredible achievement. I suspect -- I hope -- that 75 years from now, the building of orbiting structures will have advanced enough and become common enough that people will marvel at the story of the ISS, amazed that we could have accomplished something so monumental using such primitive technology, just as we now look back and admire the men of the 1930s who constructed Hoover Dam and the Golden Gate Bridge with little more than sweat and sheer determination. Of course, that's assuming that the ISS isn't the last big thing we do up there before we run out of everything and descend into a new feudalism. But I'm trying to be positive.
Getting back to Discovery, I don't know if it's because this is her final mission, or if I'm just paying more attention because it's her final mission, but there is really an amazing plethora of videos -- or should that be a plethora of amazing videos? -- from STS-133 floating around the InterWebs. I think I mentioned the other day how really, shockingly different it is today than it was even just a few years ago, when amateur movie-makers had no efficient way to share their work and NASA only released a few minutes of their footage, which the news media promptly cut down to about 15 seconds because we had to get back to the day's sports scores or some damn thing. As much as I gripe about the 21st century, I have to admit that YouTube is a boon for geeks like me. And tonight I'm taking advantage of that boon to gather here on Simple Tricks a few of my favorite video clips from the past two weeks... enjoy!
Here's another entry that probably won't be of much interest to anyone except me and possibly those readers who grew up in Utah or are otherwise familiar with the place, but I've been utterly enchanted by this find and want to share it with somebody. It's a 30-minute film called Desert Empire, which I stumbled across over on the Internet Archive -- a fascinating repository of all kinds of material that doesn't quite fit the YouTube paradigm, and isn't ever going to see a DVD release, but is still worth preserving in some fashion. The film is a 1948 travelogue in which two lovely ladies journey by train through my very own home state of Utah, stopping in such places as Arches National Park (then known as Arches National Monument), Provo City, Bingham Canyon, the original Saltair pavilion at the Great Salt Lake, and of course, Temple Square in Salt Lake City. The voiceover narration is pretty outrageous even by the charmingly effusive standards of the 1940s, but the visuals are incredible. It's fascinating to see very familiar places as they used to be, back when this state's entire population was probably less than the modern-day citizenry of metro Salt Lake, and it's even more fascinating to see how little some of these places have changed in 60 years.
Anyhow, if your curiosity is even remotely piqued, the film appears in three parts below the fold. I'll be providing a few little observations on the things that struck me about each segment...
Yeah, I know, I'm a little late with this one. Usher, would you please show that heckler to the door? Thanks. I'll wait until he's... oh, okay, good now we can talk.
Last night, I was trying to look something up when I realized that I never got around to doing my customary overview of the books, movies, and home video I enjoyed in 2009. I've managed to hit every other year since 2005, but somehow '09 got away from me. Well, anyone who knows me knows I can't tolerate that sort of inconsistency! Luckily, I was able to find my handwritten notes for that year -- yes, I keep notes about these things -- so I've now been able to put together the official Simple Tricks and Nonsense 2009 Media Wrap-Up.
(I realize, of course, that this information is likely of very little interest to anyone but myself. I'm only going to the trouble of making a blog entry at this late date for my own records, and to satisfy my OCD. Thanks for your understanding. If you're vacillating about whether to read on, it might help you to know that I'm not going to bother with any commentary on this one, it'll just be lists of titles.)
During my glorious teenage years back in the Awesome '80s, the annual AutoRama car show was a must-attend event for every red-blooded young male in the valley. No, not because of the cars, although they were neat enough -- seeing ZZ Top's Eliminator hot rod in the flesh, er, steel was a real treat, for example -- but because the show afforded the opportunity to bask in the presence of honest-to-glory Playboy Playmates. Yes, for only the price of admission plus a small additional autograph fee, any pimple-faced, scrubby-mustached, mullet-wearing doofus could have the honor of standing in a line that sometimes stretched back for a couple of hours, all to experience less than 30 seconds of facetime with a paragon of feminine pulchritude you couldn't actually go out with in a million years. Oh, and you got a signed picture, too. And occasionally a Playmate who would pose for a photo with you, although the shot never seemed to turn out because your friend with the camera had shaky hands. But hey, you could at least point at the blurry, vaguely humanoid shape and tell people who it was, and remember the prickle of flopsweat blossoming under your arms as she slipped her arm across the top of your shoulders.
Yes, those were the days.
I haven't been to an AutoRama in decades, but there's one coming up this weekend, and just for kicks I thought I'd have a look at the schedule to see if anything -- or anyone -- interesting is going to be there. The results were... disappointing. No Playmates. Instead, we've got Jeanette McCurdy, a teenaged actress from a cable-TV kid's show called iCarly, and a fisherman from that reality series The Deadliest Catch.
Sigh. Is there any doubt America is a society in decline?
I struggled all last week to compose one of my occasional political cris de couer, this one motivated by the nonsense currently going on in Wisconsin. If you've been in a cave for the last month -- and I know at least one of my Loyal Readers whose circumstances could be described as such -- Wisconsin's Republican governor is using a budgetary crisis, which he seems to have engineered himself, as a pretense to try and force his state's public-sector labor unions into giving up their collective bargaining rights. In shorter words, he's union-busting. But he's not busting all the public-sector unions. No, he's only after the ones whose members tend to vote Democratic. The Republican-leaning police and firefighter unions are safe. Which means this whole exercise is transparently partisan and blatantly ideological. I'm not interested in debating the pros and cons of unions -- Kevin Drum pretty much sums up my opinion here, and says it better than I could anyhow -- but the more unsavory political truth of the Wisconsin deal makes me mad. It is only the most obvious example of how Republicans nationwide are trying to take advantage of a shaky economy to ram through a radical right-wing social agenda that they haven't managed to accomplish in decades of trying. In other words, they're trying to kill things Republicans hate on principle anyway, while saying they have to do it to get the economy going.
Bullshit.
Here's the thing: if you really care about cutting the deficit, then you've got to be willing to at least consider letting the Bush tax cuts expire. The tax rates during the Clinton years were hardly onerous -- they were lower than the taxes in the prosperous 1950s -- and they'd go a long ways toward balancing the books. And you also ought to be trying to find a way to convince the wealthy -- who seem to think they're above paying taxes -- that they are still part of this country, even if they live behind locked gates, and it's immoral of them not to contribute to the common good. Oh, and you'd get serious about making corporations pay their fair share too. And while I'm pipe-dreaming anyhow, how about re-regulating the financial industry that caused this mess anyhow? And sending a few CEOs to jail? Or at least taking their solid-gold parachutes away from them and giving the money to the employees who got laid off to bolster the stockholders' dividends last quarter... but noooo, that's class warfare and we can't have that. Not unless it's being waged on the middle-class people who actually do the work in this country and are fast on their way to becoming vassals of a new feudalism. The sad thing is, a lot of them seem to actually want that...
Yeah, anyhow that's the gist of what I've been trying to write, but the damn thing just hasn't wanted to come together in a satisfying way, so tonight I decided "Screw it, let's do a nice harmless meme." And as fate would have it, SamuraiFrog recently provided one...


Recent Comments